Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add UX improvements to run-slice Makefile #1077

Closed

Conversation

alanorwick
Copy link
Contributor

@dominant-strategies/core-dev

$(PRIME_CMD) >> $(PRIME_LOG_FILE) 2>&1 &
$(REGION_CMD) >> $(REGION_LOG_FILE) 2>&1 &
$(ZONE_CMD) >> $(ZONE_LOG_FILE) 2>&1 &
@nohup $(PRIME_CMD) >> $(PRIME_LOG_FILE) 2>&1 &
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

run slice is invalid, we need to remove it

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

how so?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Even running a slice uses make run-all

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then why do we have 'run-all' as a make target? We should just have 'run', if there's no longer two run targets to differentiate between.

$(PRIME_CMD) >> $(PRIME_LOG_FILE) 2>&1 &
$(REGION_CMD) >> $(REGION_LOG_FILE) 2>&1 &
$(ZONE_CMD) >> $(ZONE_LOG_FILE) 2>&1 &
@nohup $(PRIME_CMD) >> $(PRIME_LOG_FILE) 2>&1 &
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Even running a slice uses make run-all

@alanorwick alanorwick closed this Sep 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants