Clarify SQL Servers Indexed Views #4425
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
SQL Server provides something similiar but with a distinct feature set from Postgres Materialized Views. Pointing out the difference, especially between automatic and manual refreshs, which can be a deal breaker.
|
@Suchiman so it took us so long to review this and thanks for pointing this out. I rewrote the materialized views section a bit and gave some place to SQL Server index views based on your suggestions. |
|
@ajcvickers can you please review my changes? |
ajcvickers
approved these changes
Sep 11, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
SQL Server provides something similiar but with a distinct feature set from Postgres Materialized Views. Pointing out the difference, especially between automatic and manual refreshs, which can be a deal breaker.