Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UnmanagedFunctionPointer doesn't require field names to be functional #10724

Merged

Conversation

vitek-karas
Copy link
Member

Summary

Fixing the doc to just state that the fields are optional.

…. Fixing the doc to just state that the fields are optional.
@vitek-karas
Copy link
Member Author

@AaronRobinsonMSFT for review.

@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added the community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member label Dec 5, 2024
Copy link

Learn Build status updates of commit 3551619:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
xml/System.Runtime.InteropServices/UnmanagedFunctionPointerAttribute.xml ✅Succeeded View

For more details, please refer to the build report.

For any questions, please:

@AaronRobinsonMSFT
Copy link
Member

/cc @gewarren

@gewarren gewarren merged commit bc175b4 into dotnet:main Dec 5, 2024
4 checks passed
@vitek-karas vitek-karas deleted the UnmanagedFunctionPointerFieldName branch December 6, 2024 09:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-System.Runtime.InteropServices community-contribution Indicates that the PR has been added by a community member
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants