deleted style field

[yeniatencio]

Ticket: https://digital-vic.atlassian.net/browse/SD-17
We want to remove style option from call to action component.

Testing link: https://nginx-php.pr-428.content-reference-sdp-vic-gov-au.sdp4.sdp.vic.gov.au/

Steps:

1. Removed style option field and update hook to roll out the updates.
2. Updated the description of the component in the field config/install for new sites and roll out the description update using the update hook for existing site.
3. Added a separate update hook to update the weight of the component to make it appear next to Ke dates component.

[vincent-gao]

hey @yeniatencio
There are a couple of dependency concerns:

1. all of tide modules they don't have dependency with drush, so I think you don't want to introduce drush dependency here.
2. https://github.com/dpc-sdp/tide_landing_page/pull/230/files#diff-7e6f6816fd76f77a0b74239e31ba4e5b1e332854d8e55ceae374edfe98dfe08bR98 could potentially overwrite configurations unintentionally for some projects, since the landing_page is used across all sites.

[yeniatencio]

hey @yeniatencio There are a couple of dependency concerns:

1. all of tide modules they don't have dependency with drush, so I think you don't want to introduce drush dependency here.
2. https://github.com/dpc-sdp/tide_landing_page/pull/230/files#diff-7e6f6816fd76f77a0b74239e31ba4e5b1e332854d8e55ceae374edfe98dfe08bR98 could potentially overwrite configurations unintentionally for some projects, since the landing_page is used across all sites.

Hey @vincent-gao , regarding to your feedback:

1. I need a dependency with drush. If that's not the correct place to add it then please point me where it should be added instead.
2. Please be more specific and suggest what is the best approach because the ticket is requesting to remove a field.

[MdNadimHossain]

Looks good to me, but please get a 2nd opinion from @vincent-gao