Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Training with No Pose Information #36

Open
JunseongAHN opened this issue May 30, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Training with No Pose Information #36

JunseongAHN opened this issue May 30, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@JunseongAHN
Copy link

JunseongAHN commented May 30, 2024

Hello, Thank you for sharing your awesome work!

I have two question regarding hyperparameters for analyzing the model performance on p values.

If you have the hyperparameters to train p = 1, could you share the hyperparameters for the datasets (e.g. CelebA, Seg2Cat, edge2Car)?

The paper says
"Conversely, only sampling random poses (p = 1) gives the best image quality but suffers huge misalignment with input label maps."

I tried to train the proposed model with p = 1 several times with various parameters, but didn't succeed. I assume that it is because when p = 1, the model is not trained with CVC loss, and it makes the training procedure harder.

Additionally, I am wondering if the values on the chart from the Figure 9 are from CelebA dataset. Is it true?

image

I greatly appreciate your work, thank you!

@JunseongAHN JunseongAHN changed the title Training with No pose information Training with No Pose Information May 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant