Possibly bogus warning for public exported types when the export target contains those types

[nlisker]

Suppose a module dep that exports package dep with class dep.D. And suppose another module:

module App {
    requires dep;

    exports app to dep;
}

then

package app;

public class A {
    public dep.D d;
}

emits a warning:

The type D from module dep may not be accessible to clients due to missing 'requires transitive'

While it's true that it may not be accessible, since the module exposes the package (and class) to the module that defines that class, we can know that it will be accessible.

Can the compiler be smarter and check if the targets of an export have access to the exposed types?

[jukzi]

I guess as long as you don't contribute such improvement nothing will happen.

[stephan-herrmann]

I believe one thing is missing from the problem description:

see:

Suppose a module dep that exports package dep with class dep.D.

and:

exports app to dep;

In order for that export to take effect module dep would also need to require module App, right?

Thus we have a cyclic dependency, which brings us back to #2122 (comment)

LMK if I missed something.

[nlisker]

In order for that export to take effect module dep would also need to require module App, right?

I don't think so because it can be accessed reflectively. See https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53035454/javafx-module-javafx-graphics.