Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NullPointer in code completion inside a Lambda. #3127

Open
jcompagner opened this issue Oct 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

NullPointer in code completion inside a Lambda. #3127

jcompagner opened this issue Oct 21, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@jcompagner
Copy link

i am using Build id: I20240903-0240

and i get this exception:

!STACK 0
java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke "org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.TypeBinding.kind()" because "receiverType" is null
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.Scope.getMethod(Scope.java:3135)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.MessageSend.findMethodBinding(MessageSend.java:1174)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.MessageSend.resolveType(MessageSend.java:904)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.Expression.resolve(Expression.java:1126)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.Statement.resolveWithBindings(Statement.java:498)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.IfStatement.resolve(IfStatement.java:311)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.Statement.resolveWithBindings(Statement.java:498)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.ASTNode.resolveStatements(ASTNode.java:725)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.Block.resolve(Block.java:128)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.Statement.resolveWithBindings(Statement.java:498)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.ASTNode.resolveStatements(ASTNode.java:725)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.Block.resolve(Block.java:128)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.Statement.resolveWithBindings(Statement.java:498)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.ASTNode.resolveStatements(ASTNode.java:725)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.Block.resolve(Block.java:128)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.Statement.resolveWithBindings(Statement.java:498)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.ASTNode.resolveStatements(ASTNode.java:725)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.Block.resolve(Block.java:128)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.ForeachStatement.resolve(ForeachStatement.java:683)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.Statement.resolveWithBindings(Statement.java:498)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.ASTNode.resolveStatements(ASTNode.java:725)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.Block.resolve(Block.java:128)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.Statement.resolveWithBindings(Statement.java:498)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.ASTNode.resolveStatements(ASTNode.java:725)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.Block.resolve(Block.java:128)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.Statement.resolveWithBindings(Statement.java:498)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.ASTNode.resolveStatements(ASTNode.java:725)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.Block.resolve(Block.java:128)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.Statement.resolveWithBindings(Statement.java:498)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.ASTNode.resolveStatements(ASTNode.java:725)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.AbstractMethodDeclaration.resolveStatements(AbstractMethodDeclaration.java:713)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.ConstructorDeclaration.resolveStatements(ConstructorDeclaration.java:685)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.AbstractMethodDeclaration.resolve(AbstractMethodDeclaration.java:611)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.TypeDeclaration.resolve(TypeDeclaration.java:1514)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.TypeDeclaration.resolve(TypeDeclaration.java:1643)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.ast.CompilationUnitDeclaration.resolve(CompilationUnitDeclaration.java:666)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.codeassist.CompletionEngine.complete(CompletionEngine.java:2335)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.Openable.codeComplete(Openable.java:135)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.CompilationUnit.codeComplete(CompilationUnit.java:360)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.CompilationUnit.codeComplete(CompilationUnit.java:350)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.java.ChainCompletionProposalComputer.initializeRequiredContext(ChainCompletionProposalComputer.java:94)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.java.ChainCompletionProposalComputer.computeCompletionProposals(ChainCompletionProposalComputer.java:71)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.java.CompletionProposalComputerDescriptor.computeCompletionProposals(CompletionProposalComputerDescriptor.java:354)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.java.CompletionProposalCategory.computeCompletionProposals(CompletionProposalCategory.java:340)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.java.ContentAssistProcessor.collectProposals(ContentAssistProcessor.java:332)
	at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.java.ContentAssistProcessor.computeCompletionProposals(ContentAssistProcessor.java:288)
	at org.eclipse.jface.text.contentassist.AsyncCompletionProposalPopup.lambda$10(AsyncCompletionProposalPopup.java:378)
	at org.eclipse.core.runtime.SafeRunner.run(SafeRunner.java:47)
	at org.eclipse.jface.text.contentassist.AsyncCompletionProposalPopup.lambda$9(AsyncCompletionProposalPopup.java:377)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncSupply.run(CompletableFuture.java:1768)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncSupply.exec(CompletableFuture.java:1760)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:387)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec(ForkJoinPool.java:1312)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan(ForkJoinPool.java:1843)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1808)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:188)

when i am trying to code complete inside a lambda

this is part of my code:
i added 2 comment lines where code completion works and where it fails

			if (docFile.exists())
			{
				try
				{
					String docContents = FileUtils.readFileToString(docFile, Charset.forName("UTF8"));
					CompilerEnvirons env = new CompilerEnvirons();
					env.setRecordingComments(true);
					env.setRecordingLocalJsDocComments(true);
					org.mozilla.javascript.Parser parser = new org.mozilla.javascript.Parser(env);
					AstRoot parse = parser.parse(docContents, "", 0);
					SortedSet<Comment> comments = parse.getComments();
					Comment prevComment = null;
					if (comments != null) for (Comment comment : comments)
					{
						if (comment.getNext() instanceof FunctionNode fn)
						{
							String name = fn.getFunctionName().toSource();
							apiDoc.put(name, processFunctionJSDoc(comment.toSource()));
							if (fn.getBody().hasChildren())
							{
								// here code completion works
								fn.getBody().forEach(node -> {
									if (node instanceof ExpressionStatement es)
									{
										// here code completion fails
									}
								});
							}
						}
						else if (prevComment == null)
						{
							// it's the top-most comment that gives a short description of the purpose of the whole component/service
							apiDoc.put(WEB_OBJECT_OVERVIEW_KEY, processFunctionJSDoc(comment.toSource()));
						}
						prevComment = comment;
					}


				}
				catch (IOException e)
				{
					throw new RuntimeException("Cannot parse docfile: " + docFileName, e);
				}
			}
			else
			{
				System.err.println("    * docfile: " + docFileName + " doesn't exist in the parent structure of the spec file " + specFile + " !");
			}
@srikanth-sankaran
Copy link
Contributor

We are a bit resource constrained unfortunately. Defect reports that have readily reproducible cases will likely receiver swifter response relatively speaking.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants