Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

meta-leda-backports vs meta-lts-mixins #171

Open
mikehaller opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #210
Open

meta-leda-backports vs meta-lts-mixins #171

mikehaller opened this issue Jun 21, 2023 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #210

Comments

@mikehaller
Copy link
Contributor

We introduced meta-leda-backports to port GoLang 1.19+ back to kirkstone, which is required by meta-kanto due to security vulnerabilities upgrades.

In the meantime, we found meta-lts-mixins to provide backports for kirkstone as well.
It may be good to migrate to the official meta-lts-mixins instead of maintaining our own meta-leda-backports.
@d-s-e d-s-e moved this to 🏗 In progress in Leda Roadmap Dec 19, 2023
@d-s-e d-s-e linked a pull request Dec 19, 2023 that will close this issue
remove layer meta-leda backports in favour of meta-lts-mixins #210
Open
@d-s-e d-s-e self-assigned this Dec 19, 2023
@d-s-e
Copy link
Contributor

d-s-e commented Dec 19, 2023

fixed with #210

@d-s-e d-s-e removed their assignment Dec 19, 2023
@d-s-e d-s-e moved this from 🏗 In progress to 👀 In review in Leda Roadmap Dec 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
Leda Roadmap
Status: 👀 In review
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

remove layer meta-leda backports in favour of meta-lts-mixins eclipse-leda/meta-leda
2 participants
@mikehaller @d-s-e