-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore/remove class files, fix typos, code refactor and sonar findings #89
chore/remove class files, fix typos, code refactor and sonar findings #89
Conversation
@borisrizov-zf Can you re-run the build job, not sure why it is failing. |
@nitin-vavdiya seems that the dash license tool has some issues right now. |
|
@borisrizov-zf May I know what is the blocker to merge this PR? |
@nitin-vavdiya I was actually hoping to merge the #77 first. It's just taking some time. |
@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ | |||
import org.eclipse.tractusx.ssi.lib.crypt.IPrivateKey; | |||
import org.eclipse.tractusx.ssi.lib.crypt.IPublicKey; | |||
import org.eclipse.tractusx.ssi.lib.crypt.jwk.JsonWebKey; | |||
import org.eclipse.tractusx.ssi.lib.crypt.x25519.x25519PrivateKey; | |||
import org.eclipse.tractusx.ssi.lib.crypt.x25519.x25519PublicKey; | |||
import org.eclipse.tractusx.ssi.lib.crypt.x25519.X25519PrivateKey; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a breaking change, I'm not sure it's necessary, just because sonar is squawking.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is just to align with Java naming convention
src/main/java/org/eclipse/tractusx/ssi/examples/BuildDIDDocEd25519VerificationKey2020.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/org/eclipse/tractusx/ssi/examples/ResolveDIDDoc.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ public enum VerifiableType { | |||
* @param json the json | |||
* @param type the type | |||
*/ | |||
public Verifiable(Map<String, Object> json, VerifiableType type) { | |||
protected Verifiable(Map<String, Object> json, VerifiableType type) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is the visibility changed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same as above
src/main/java/org/eclipse/tractusx/ssi/lib/proof/IVerifier.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@@ -39,18 +38,16 @@ public interface IVerifier { | |||
* model to get the public key of issuer. | |||
* | |||
* @param hashedLinkedData the hashed linked data | |||
* @param document {@link VerifiableCredential} the verifiable | |||
* @param verifiable {@link VerifiableCredential} the verifiable | |||
* @return boolean if verified or not | |||
* @throws UnsupportedSignatureTypeException |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems unused.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
verifiable is a method argument of verify method
src/test/java/org/eclipse/tractusx/ssi/lib/proof/SignAndVerifyTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/test/java/org/eclipse/tractusx/ssi/lib/proof/SignAndVerifyTest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@borisrizov-zf Class rename is only to align with Java naming standard |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please rebase, as we've merged a PR since the last edit. I'll merge after.
39c8365
to
9591bec
Compare
@borisrizov-zf rebase done |
@nitin-vavdiya hi, I checked the rebase-ability of the branch against #91 . They have merge conflicts, so please wait for the merge and rebase. While you're rebasing, please also fix typos in the git commits such as in |
a029a92
to
81408ff
Compare
@nitin-vavdiya Hi, the JWT branch is merged. You can go ahead and rebase. You'll get some issues, but it's mostly updated docstrings. |
…java Co-authored-by: Boris Rizov (ZF Friedrichshafen AG) <138589018+borisrizov-zf@users.noreply.github.com>
…Test.java Co-authored-by: Boris Rizov (ZF Friedrichshafen AG) <138589018+borisrizov-zf@users.noreply.github.com>
…Test.java Co-authored-by: Boris Rizov (ZF Friedrichshafen AG) <138589018+borisrizov-zf@users.noreply.github.com>
81408ff
to
c1a86a5
Compare
@borisrizov-zf Rebase done |
Description
Before sonar fixes:
After sonar fixes:
Pre-review checks
Please ensure to do as many of the following checks as possible, before asking for committer review: