Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed bugs with Bisect exercise #370

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

TidosDK
Copy link
Contributor

@TidosDK TidosDK commented Aug 7, 2024

This pull request solves two issues.

The first is the requirement of having global git credentials, which is solved with the already built-in shell script: config-local-username


The other issue is with the verify.sh file, which had syntax errors.

This pull request is related to issue #369

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a command for configuring a local username in the setup process, enhancing personalization and setup efficiency.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved compatibility of the verification script by changing the conditional check syntax to a more POSIX-compliant format.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 7, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the bisect/setup.sh and bisect/verify.sh scripts to improve user configuration and compatibility. A new command for setting a local username has been added to the setup script, while the verify script's conditional syntax has been updated for better POSIX compliance. These modifications aim to streamline the setup process and ensure broader compatibility across shell environments.

Changes

File Change Summary
bisect/setup.sh Added a new command config-local-username to configure a local username during setup.
bisect/verify.sh Modified conditional syntax from [[ ... ]] to [ ... ] for improved POSIX compliance.

Poem

🐰 In the meadow, scripts do play,
A local name now leads the way.
With checks aligned to POSIX grace,
Our setup shines, a happy place!
Let's hop along, the code is bright,
A joyful script on a starry night! ✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c0ab7fb and 8bf583a.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • bisect/setup.sh (1 hunks)
  • bisect/verify.sh (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • bisect/verify.sh
Additional comments not posted (1)
bisect/setup.sh (1)

5-5: Verify the availability and correctness of config-local-username.

Ensure that the config-local-username command is correctly implemented and available in the environment. This addition addresses the issue of requiring global Git credentials by configuring the Git username locally.

Verification successful

The config-local-username command is correctly implemented and available.

The config-local-username command is defined in utils/make-setup.sh and correctly sets the local Git user name and email for the exercise repository. This addition addresses the issue of requiring global Git credentials by configuring the Git username locally.

  • utils/make-setup.sh: Definition of config-local-username command.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of `config-local-username`.

# Test: Search for the implementation of `config-local-username`. Expect: The command should be defined and available.
rg --type shell --pattern 'config-local-username'

Length of output: 461


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of `config-local-username`.

# Test: Search for the implementation of `config-local-username`. Expect: The command should be defined and available.
rg 'config-local-username' --type sh

Length of output: 212


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the definition of `config-local-username` from `utils/make-setup.sh`.

# Test: Extract the function definition of `config-local-username`.
rg 'config-local-username() {' -A 10 utils/make-setup.sh

Length of output: 172


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the definition of `config-local-username` from `utils/make-setup.sh`.

# Test: Extract the function definition of `config-local-username`.
rg 'config-local-username\(\) \{' -A 10 utils/make-setup.sh

Length of output: 531

bisect/setup.sh Outdated
Comment on lines 4 to 5
make-exercise-repo
config-local-username
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
make-exercise-repo
config-local-username
pre-setup

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The config-local-username is better applied through the help function pre-setup, which also takes care of gpg-signature configurations.

And also, we then need a post-setup call at the end of the file, to reset (unset) the robot user, so any future commits will be with own user.
But it seems as if the GH user-interface won't let me add a "suggestion" to lines outside the scope of the original change. Can I ask you to add a post-setup call at the end of the verify.sh script as well?

@JKrag
Copy link
Contributor

JKrag commented Aug 29, 2024

I am aware that there is also currently a problem with the pipeline. I have created #372 and will investigate.

bisect/setup.sh Outdated
Comment on lines 4 to 5
make-exercise-repo
config-local-username
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The config-local-username is better applied through the help function pre-setup, which also takes care of gpg-signature configurations.

And also, we then need a post-setup call at the end of the file, to reset (unset) the robot user, so any future commits will be with own user.
But it seems as if the GH user-interface won't let me add a "suggestion" to lines outside the scope of the original change. Can I ask you to add a post-setup call at the end of the verify.sh script as well?

bisect/verify.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@JKrag JKrag self-assigned this Nov 4, 2024
@JKrag
Copy link
Contributor

JKrag commented Nov 4, 2024

Change has been accepted with small changes in local PR #376, so there are no changes left in this PR and therefor I can't merge it. Closing the PR.
Thanks for the contribution @TidosDK

@JKrag JKrag closed this Nov 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants