[Rebase-Exec] exercise more intuitive #242 #374
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to documentation and scripts within the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
rebase-exec/setup.sh (2)
10-10: Approve the addition of 'first-commit' tag, but suggest further improvements.The addition of the 'first-commit' tag is a good step towards making the exercise more intuitive. It provides a clear starting point for the rebase-exec exercise.
However, the current setup doesn't fully address the concerns raised in the linked issue #242. Consider implementing the proposed solution of creating a
zero.shscript and atest.shthat asserts its output.To fully align with the proposed solution:
- Create a
zero.shscript that performs a simple mathematical operation.- Implement a
test.shthat assertszero.shexits with a value of 0.- Modify the commits to change
zero.sh, with one commit breaking the expected outcome.This approach would create a more logical and intuitive exercise for users engaging with the rebase-exec task.
Line range hint
1-33: Restructure the script to align with PR objectives and proposed solution.The current script structure, which creates and commits empty text files, doesn't fully address the concerns raised in issue #242. While it simplifies the setup, it doesn't provide a meaningful context for the rebase-exec exercise.
Consider restructuring the script as follows:
- Create and commit
zero.shwith a simple mathematical operation.- Create and commit
test.shthat assertszero.shexits with 0.- Create commits that modify
zero.sh, with one commit breaking the expected outcome.For example:
#!/bin/bash source ../utils/utils.sh make-exercise-repo # Create and commit zero.sh echo '#!/bin/bash exit 0' > zero.sh chmod +x zero.sh git add zero.sh git commit -m "Add zero.sh that exits with 0" git tag first-commit # Create and commit test.sh echo '#!/bin/bash ./zero.sh if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then echo "Test passed" exit 0 else echo "Test failed" exit 1 fi' > test.sh chmod +x test.sh git add test.sh git commit -m "Add test.sh to verify zero.sh" # Modify zero.sh to return non-zero (breaking commit) echo '#!/bin/bash exit 1' > zero.sh git add zero.sh git commit -m "Modify zero.sh to exit with 1 (breaking change)" # Additional commits modifying zero.sh echo '#!/bin/bash exit 2' > zero.sh git add zero.sh git commit -m "Modify zero.sh to exit with 2" echo '#!/bin/bash exit 3' > zero.sh git add zero.sh git commit -m "Modify zero.sh to exit with 3"This structure provides a more intuitive and meaningful context for the rebase-exec exercise, aligning with the objectives outlined in issue #242.
rebase-exec/setup.ps1 (2)
Line range hint
1-28: Revise script to align with PR objectivesThe current script structure, which creates multiple empty text files, doesn't align with the proposed solution outlined in the PR objectives. To make the rebase-exec exercise more intuitive, consider implementing the following changes:
- Create a
zero.shscript that performs a simple mathematical operation and exits with the result.- Create a
test.shscript that assertszero.shexits with a value of 0.- Modify the commit structure to include changes to
zero.sh, with one commit breaking the expected outcome.These changes would better reflect the scenario described in the linked issue #242 and create a more logical and intuitive exercise for users.
Would you like assistance in drafting the revised script structure to meet these objectives?
Incomplete Implementation of Issue #242
The verification confirms that the
rebase-exec/setup.ps1script does not include any test-related content, and thetest.shandzero.shfiles are missing from therebase-execdirectory.Please ensure that all components addressing issue #242 are included in this PR.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-28: Verify completeness of changes and current PR stateThe visible changes in this script don't fully address the objectives outlined in the PR description and linked issue #242. Additionally, there's a discrepancy between the AI-generated summary (which mentions removal of test script sections) and the visible changes in the file.
To ensure a comprehensive review:
- Please confirm if there are any additional changes not visible in this diff.
- Clarify the current state of the PR - is it still a work in progress?
- If this represents the complete changes, consider revising the PR to fully implement the proposed solution from issue Make the rebase-exec exercise a little more intuitive #242.
To help verify the current state of the file and any potential missing changes, please run the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the contents of setup.ps1 and check for any test-related files # Display the full contents of setup.ps1 echo "Contents of setup.ps1:" cat rebase-exec/setup.ps1 # Check for the existence of test.sh or zero.sh echo -e "\nChecking for test.sh and zero.sh:" ls rebase-exec/test.sh rebase-exec/zero.sh 2>/dev/null || echo "test.sh and zero.sh not found in rebase-exec directory" # Search for any test-related content in setup.ps1 echo -e "\nSearching for test-related content in setup.ps1:" grep -i "test" rebase-exec/setup.ps1 || echo "No test-related content found in setup.ps1"Length of output: 1007
rebase-exec/README.md (2)
9-15: Improve clarity and fix minor grammatical issues in Example 1The new example is a great addition and aligns well with the PR objective of making the exercise more intuitive. However, there are a few minor issues to address:
Line 12: Add "the" before "last commit" and fix the verb form:
-1. Run `git log --patch` command to see what changes are include in last commit. +1. Run the `git log --patch` command to see what changes are included in the last commit.Line 13: Break the long line into multiple lines for better readability and fix "commits" to singular:
-2. Run `git rebase -i --exec "echo '1' >> 4.txt && git add 4.txt && git commit --amend --no-edit" HEAD~3` command it will open configured editor with information what command will be executed for each commits which is notified by `exec <command>` you can either modify the command or save and exit the editor to let the command run for that specific commit. +2. Run the following command: + ``` + git rebase -i --exec "echo '1' >> 4.txt && git add 4.txt && git commit --amend --no-edit" HEAD~3 + ``` + This will open a configured editor with information about what command will be executed for each commit, notified by `exec <command>`. You can either modify the command or save and exit the editor to let the command run for that specific commit.Line 14: Add "the" before "changes":
-3. Run `git log --patch` command to see what are the changes in commits. +3. Run the `git log --patch` command to see what the changes are in the commits.These changes will improve the clarity and grammatical correctness of the example.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~12-
12: You might be missing the article “the” here.3
Context: ...-i --exec <command(s)> HEAD. 1. Rungit log --patch` command to see what cha...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[uncategorized] ~12-~12: This verb may not be in the correct form. Consider using a different form for this context.
Context: ...-patchcommand to see what changes are include in last commit. 2. Rungit rebase -i -...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_FORM)
[uncategorized] ~12-~12: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...mand to see what changes are include in last commit. 2. Run `git rebase -i --exec "e...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[grammar] ~13-~13: The noun should probably be in the singular form.
Context: ... what command will be executed for each commits which is notified byexec <command>y...(EVERY_EACH_SINGULAR)
[style] ~14-~14: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ommand run for that specific commit. 3. Rungit log --patchcommand to see what a...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🪛 Markdownlint
9-9: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
16-22: Enhance clarity and fix minor issues in Example 2The second example is another valuable addition that contributes to the exercise's intuitiveness. Here are some suggestions to improve it:
Line 19: Change "detail" to plural and add "the" before "commit":
-1. Run `git log --format="commit: %H%nauthor: %an%n"` command to see detail related to commit and author. +1. Run the `git log --format="commit: %H%nauthor: %an%n"` command to see details related to the commit and author.Line 20: Break the long line into multiple lines for better readability and fix "commits" to singular:
-2. Run `git rebase -i --root --exec "git commit --amend --author='my name <myemail@home.com>' --no-edit"` command it will open configured editor with information what command will be executed for each commits which is notified by `exec <command>` you can either modify the command or save and exit the editor to let the command run for that specific commit. +2. Run the following command: + ``` + git rebase -i --root --exec "git commit --amend --author='my name <myemail@home.com>' --no-edit" + ``` + This will open a configured editor with information about what command will be executed for each commit, notified by `exec <command>`. You can either modify the command or save and exit the editor to let the command run for that specific commit.Line 21: Add "the" before "changes" and "in":
-3. Run `git log --format="commit: %H%nauthor: %an%n"` command to see the changes author information for the commits. +3. Run the `git log --format="commit: %H%nauthor: %an%n"` command to see the changes in the author information for the commits.These changes will improve the readability and grammatical correctness of the second example.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~19-~19: The grammatical number of this noun doesn’t look right. Consider replacing it.
Context: ...mit: %H%nauthor: %an%n"command to see detail related to commit and author. 2. Rung...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_NOUN_NUMBER)
[grammar] ~20-~20: The noun should probably be in the singular form.
Context: ... what command will be executed for each commits which is notified byexec <command>y...(EVERY_EACH_SINGULAR)
[style] ~21-~21: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ommand run for that specific commit. 3. Run `git log --format="commit: %H%nauthor: ...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🪛 Markdownlint
16-16: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- rebase-exec/README.md (1 hunks)
- rebase-exec/setup.ps1 (1 hunks)
- rebase-exec/setup.sh (1 hunks)
- rebase-exec/verify.ps1 (0 hunks)
- rebase-exec/verify.sh (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- rebase-exec/verify.ps1
- rebase-exec/verify.sh
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
rebase-exec/README.md
[uncategorized] ~12-
12: You might be missing the article “the” here.3
Context: ...-i --exec <command(s)> HEAD. 1. Rungit log --patch` command to see what cha...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[uncategorized] ~12-~12: This verb may not be in the correct form. Consider using a different form for this context.
Context: ...-patchcommand to see what changes are include in last commit. 2. Rungit rebase -i -...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_FORM)
[uncategorized] ~12-~12: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...mand to see what changes are include in last commit. 2. Run `git rebase -i --exec "e...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[grammar] ~13-~13: The noun should probably be in the singular form.
Context: ... what command will be executed for each commits which is notified byexec <command>y...(EVERY_EACH_SINGULAR)
[style] ~14-~14: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ommand run for that specific commit. 3. Rungit log --patchcommand to see what a...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[uncategorized] ~19-~19: The grammatical number of this noun doesn’t look right. Consider replacing it.
Context: ...mit: %H%nauthor: %an%n"command to see detail related to commit and author. 2. Rung...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_NOUN_NUMBER)
[grammar] ~20-~20: The noun should probably be in the singular form.
Context: ... what command will be executed for each commits which is notified byexec <command>y...(EVERY_EACH_SINGULAR)
[style] ~21-~21: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ommand run for that specific commit. 3. Run `git log --format="commit: %H%nauthor: ...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🪛 Markdownlint
rebase-exec/README.md
9-9: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
16-16: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
rebase-exec/setup.ps1 (1)
6-6: Approve: Addition of 'first-commit' tag enhances exercise clarityThe addition of the
first-committag after the initial commit is a good improvement. This tag provides a clear reference point for students working on the rebase-exec exercise, making it easier to understand the starting state of the repository. It aligns well with the goal of making the exercise more intuitive.rebase-exec/README.md (2)
23-28: LGTM: Useful commands sectionThe "Useful commands" section is a great addition to the README. It provides a quick reference for the commands used in the examples, which will be helpful for users working through the exercise. The commands are correctly listed and match those used in the examples.
9-28: Overall: Excellent improvements to the rebase-exec exercise documentationThe changes made to this README file significantly enhance the documentation for the rebase-exec exercise, aligning well with the PR objectives of making the exercise more intuitive and user-friendly. Here's a summary of the improvements:
- Two practical examples have been added, demonstrating different use cases of
git rebase -i --exec.- The examples provide step-by-step instructions, making it easier for users to follow along.
- A "Useful commands" section has been included, offering quick reference to the commands used in the examples.
These additions will greatly benefit users working through the exercise, providing them with clear, practical demonstrations of how to use
git rebase -i --execin different scenarios.While there are some minor grammatical and formatting issues (which I've addressed in previous comments), they don't detract from the overall quality of the content. Addressing these minor issues will further polish the documentation.
Great job on improving the exercise documentation!
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~12-
12: You might be missing the article “the” here.3
Context: ...-i --exec <command(s)> HEAD. 1. Rungit log --patch` command to see what cha...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[uncategorized] ~12-~12: This verb may not be in the correct form. Consider using a different form for this context.
Context: ...-patchcommand to see what changes are include in last commit. 2. Rungit rebase -i -...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_FORM)
[uncategorized] ~12-~12: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...mand to see what changes are include in last commit. 2. Run `git rebase -i --exec "e...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[grammar] ~13-~13: The noun should probably be in the singular form.
Context: ... what command will be executed for each commits which is notified byexec <command>y...(EVERY_EACH_SINGULAR)
[style] ~14-~14: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ommand run for that specific commit. 3. Rungit log --patchcommand to see what a...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[uncategorized] ~19-~19: The grammatical number of this noun doesn’t look right. Consider replacing it.
Context: ...mit: %H%nauthor: %an%n"command to see detail related to commit and author. 2. Rung...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_NOUN_NUMBER)
[grammar] ~20-~20: The noun should probably be in the singular form.
Context: ... what command will be executed for each commits which is notified byexec <command>y...(EVERY_EACH_SINGULAR)
[style] ~21-~21: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ommand run for that specific commit. 3. Run `git log --format="commit: %H%nauthor: ...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🪛 Markdownlint
9-9: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
16-16: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
rebase-exec/README.md (3)
9-18: Excellent addition of a practical example!The first example provides clear, step-by-step instructions on using
git rebase -i --execto add content to files in the last three commits. This aligns well with the PR objective of making the exercise more intuitive.A couple of minor suggestions:
- Remove the trailing colon from the heading on line 9 to adhere to Markdown best practices.
- Add a language specifier to the code block on line 15 for better syntax highlighting.
Here's a suggested change for the heading and code block:
-### Example 1: +### Example 1 Adding content to file in last 3 commits using `git rebase -i --exec <command(s)> HEAD~3`. 1. Run the `git log --patch` command to see what changes are included in the last commit. 2. Run the following command: - ``` + ```bash git rebase -i --exec "echo '1' >> 4.txt && git add 4.txt && git commit --amend --no-edit" HEAD~3 ```🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
9-9: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
14-14: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
20-29: Great addition of a second practical example!Example 2 provides clear instructions on using
git rebase -i --execto change the author for all commits. This further enhances the intuitiveness of the exercise.Similar to Example 1, there are a couple of minor suggestions:
- Remove the trailing colon from the heading on line 20 to adhere to Markdown best practices.
- Add a language specifier to the code block on line 26 for better syntax highlighting.
Here's a suggested change for the heading and code block:
-### Example 2: +### Example 2 Change the author for all the commits using `git rebase -i --exec`. 1. Run the `git log --format="commit: %H%nauthor: %an%n"` command to see details related to the commit and author. 2. Run the following command: - ``` + ```bash git rebase -i --root --exec "git commit --amend --author='my name <myemail@home.com>' --no-edit" ```🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
20-20: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
25-25: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
Line range hint
1-36: Excellent revision of the rebase-exec exercise documentation!This update to the README.md file successfully addresses the concerns raised in issue #242 and significantly improves the intuitiveness of the rebase-exec exercise. The key improvements include:
- Two clear, practical examples demonstrating the use of
git rebase -i --exec.- Step-by-step instructions for each example, making it easier for users to follow along.
- A new "Useful commands" section providing quick reference for the commands used.
These changes make the exercise more logical and user-friendly, aligning perfectly with the PR objectives. The examples now interact directly with the repository contents, providing a more intuitive learning experience.
To further enhance the exercise, consider the following suggestions:
- Add a brief explanation of why and when one might use
git rebase -i --execat the beginning of the file.- Include a small section on potential pitfalls or things to be cautious about when using this command.
- If possible, incorporate the idea from issue Make the rebase-exec exercise a little more intuitive #242 about creating a
zero.shscript and atest.shthat asserts its output. This could be added as a third example or as a separate exercise building on the concepts introduced here.🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
9-9: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
20-20: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
14-14: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
25-25: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- rebase-exec/README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
rebase-exec/README.md
9-9: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
20-20: Punctuation: ':'
Trailing punctuation in heading(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
14-14: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
25-25: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rebase-exec/README.md (1)
31-36: Excellent addition of a Useful commands section!The new "Useful commands" section provides a quick reference for the commands used in the examples. This addition enhances the overall usability of the documentation and supports the goal of making the exercise more intuitive.
Closes: #242
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
rebase-exec/README.mdwith new examples and clarifications for usinggit rebase -i --exec.Chores
setup.ps1andsetup.sh, simplifying the setup process.first-commitin bothsetup.ps1andsetup.sh.verify.ps1andverify.sh, which were responsible for validation checks.