Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding options to add custom potentials and particles. Also setting t… #104

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

fsmoncadaa
Copy link
Collaborator

…he mass from the isotope as the default value for the nuclear mass. Solves issues #31 and #100

Added the option to define "eta" (particles per orbital) directly from the input. As example, one test defining positron in closed shell. Removed the TIP4P particles and potentials from lib/databases, and now they are passed directly from the input (see these tests as examples). Added a test for the isotopes mass.
Merged externalPotential and interPotential into a single module GTFpotential Now the script moves the fchk to/from the scratch. Also, when looking for the coefficients from these files, now it does not stop when it fails to find a fchk for a species, instead does a HCore guess. However, the fchks tests are still missing (related to #103)

…he mass from the isotope as the default value for the nuclear mass. Solves issues #31 and #100

Added the option to define "eta" (particles per orbital) directly from the input. As example, one test defining positron in closed shell.
Removed the TIP4P particles and potentials from lib/databases, and now they are passed directly from the input (see these tests as examples).
Added a test for the isotopes mass.
Merged externalPotential and interPotential into a single module GTFpotential
Now the script moves the fchk to/from the scratch. Also, when looking for the coefficients from these files, now it does not stop when it fails to find a fchk for a species, instead does a HCore guess. However, the fchks tests are still missing (related to #103)
@fsmoncadaa fsmoncadaa marked this pull request as ready for review November 27, 2024 17:01
@fsmoncadaa fsmoncadaa marked this pull request as draft November 27, 2024 17:09
The tests worked because I didnt remove the potential files from the lib/ folder so it read those and got the correct result
@fsmoncadaa fsmoncadaa marked this pull request as ready for review November 27, 2024 17:29
@fsmoncadaa fsmoncadaa requested a review from jacharrym November 27, 2024 17:49
@jacharrym jacharrym merged commit 77837ad into master Nov 27, 2024
1 check passed
@fsmoncadaa fsmoncadaa deleted the moreEasyIssues branch November 27, 2024 19:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

custom potentials and new particles directly from the input Check default nuclear masses
2 participants