Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PICO checker #762

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from
Closed

PICO checker #762

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

Ao-senXiong
Copy link
Member

I am not sure this will be easier or harder to review for PICO. I can getting PICO to eisop since ultimately we will do.

@Ao-senXiong Ao-senXiong requested a review from wmdietl May 29, 2024 16:30
@wmdietl
Copy link
Member

wmdietl commented May 31, 2024

Let's finish reviewing and improving this in the separate repo before moving it here.

@wmdietl wmdietl closed this May 31, 2024
Copy link
Member

@wmdietl wmdietl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some small comments, to address in the PICO repo.

@@ -256,6 +256,8 @@ allprojects {
'**/returnsreceiverdelomboked/*',
'**/build/**',
'*/dist/**',
// Don't format util the error report location is fixed
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All tests should be formatted properly. There is nothing special about PICO tests.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, that's the next thing we should look at in the future. I opened an issue in opprop opprop/immutability#53.

@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Target({ElementType.FIELD})
@HoldsForDefaultValue
public @interface Assignable {}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add javadoc for everything (again, in the PICO repo).

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, I will create a new PR to add the Javadoc.

echo " https://github.com/eisop-plume-lib/plume-scripts/blob/master/git-authors.sed" &&
echo " and remake contributors.tex after that pull request is merged." &&
false)
##!/bin/bash
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are all the misc tests disabled?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A lot of Javadoc issues and I just disabled for testing other tasks.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Ao-senXiong For the future: to disable the Javadoc checks, do touch SKIP-REQUIRE-JAVADOC in the top-level directory and add that file.

Copy link
Member Author

@Ao-senXiong Ao-senXiong Jun 3, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, thanks. I think I already had it but still get javadoc tasks errors, but nvm, let's find out why when PICO is moved here.


import javax.lang.model.element.AnnotationMirror;

public interface ExtendedViewpointAdapter extends ViewpointAdapter {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We really need some documentation for what this interface is for. Is it PICO specific? Should it just be in the main interface?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@wmdietl I removed those dummy interfaces in 2789ede

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants