Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Formula Name Conflict Between Two Projects #352

Closed
kud opened this issue Sep 12, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Formula Name Conflict Between Two Projects #352

kud opened this issue Sep 12, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@kud
Copy link

kud commented Sep 12, 2023

Hello maintainers,

I wanted to bring to your attention that there's a naming conflict for the formula between these two projects:

I use both of these projects and have experienced conflicts when attempting to install them together. I understand that naming can be tricky, but it would be greatly appreciated if one of the projects could consider renaming their formula to avoid this issue. This would greatly enhance the user experience for those of us utilizing both tools.

image

Thank you for your understanding and consideration. I really appreciate the hard work you've put into developing these tools.

Best regards,

Related: spacedentist/spr#177

@ejoffe
Copy link
Owner

ejoffe commented Sep 12, 2023

This is indeed very unfortunate.
In fact, it used to be that brew install spr would just work for installing this package, but then getcord overwrote it and hence you now need to use the full path for this package with brew install ejoffe/tap/spr.
As the older repo and tool, I have no plans to change the name of the tool or the tap at this point of time.

@kud
Copy link
Author

kud commented Sep 12, 2023

This is indeed very unfortunate. In fact, it used to be that brew install spr would just work for installing this package, but then getcord overwrote it and hence you now need to use the full path for this package with brew install ejoffe/tap/spr. As the older repo and tool, I have no plans to change the name of the tool or the tap at this point of time.

Thank you for your prompt response. I understand your point of view and will see how it goes on Getcord's side.

@maverick1872
Copy link

@ejoffe while I agree with your perspective; getcord/spr has been introduced into the core homebrew repository as such the onus likely falls to you unfortunately.

@ejoffe
Copy link
Owner

ejoffe commented Jan 11, 2024

no current plans to rename the tool. closing this issue.

@ejoffe ejoffe closed this as completed Jan 11, 2024
@davinkevin
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants