Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[New Rule] Potential Data Splitting Detected #4235

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Aegrah
Copy link
Contributor

@Aegrah Aegrah commented Nov 4, 2024

Summary

This rule looks for the usage of common data splitting utilities with specific arguments that indicate data splitting for exfiltration on Linux systems. Data splitting is a technique used by adversaries to split data into smaller parts to avoid detection and exfiltrate data.

@protectionsmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Rule: New - Guidelines

These guidelines serve as a reminder set of considerations when proposing a new rule.

Documentation and Context

  • Detailed description of the rule.
  • List any new fields required in ECS/data sources.
  • Link related issues or PRs.
  • Include references.

Rule Metadata Checks

  • creation_date matches the date of creation PR initially merged.
  • min_stack_version should support the widest stack versions.
  • name and description should be descriptive and not include typos.
  • query should be inclusive, not overly exclusive, considering performance for diverse environments. Non ecs fields should be added to non-ecs-schema.json if not available in an integration.
  • min_stack_comments and min_stack_version should be included if the rule is only compatible starting from a specific stack version.
  • index pattern should be neither too specific nor too vague, ensuring it accurately matches the relevant data stream (e.g., use logs-endpoint.process-* for process data).
  • integration should align with the index. If the integration is newly introduced, ensure the manifest, schemas, and new_rule.yaml template are updated.
  • setup should include the necessary steps to configure the integration.
  • note should include any additional information (e.g. Triage and analysis investigation guides, timeline templates).
  • tags should be relevant to the threat and align/added to the EXPECTED_RULE_TAGS in the definitions.py file.
  • threat, techniques, and subtechniques should map to ATT&CK always if possible.

New BBR Rules

  • building_block_type should be included if the rule is a building block and the rule should be located in the rules_building_block folder.
  • bypass_bbr_timing should be included if adding custom lookback timing to the rule.

Testing and Validation

  • Provide evidence of testing and detecting the expected threat.
  • Check for existence of coverage to prevent duplication.

@Aegrah Aegrah merged commit f89e245 into main Nov 8, 2024
9 checks passed
@Aegrah Aegrah deleted the data-splitting-activity branch November 8, 2024 16:33
protectionsmachine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2024
Co-authored-by: shashank-elastic <91139415+shashank-elastic@users.noreply.github.com>

(cherry picked from commit f89e245)
protectionsmachine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2024
Co-authored-by: shashank-elastic <91139415+shashank-elastic@users.noreply.github.com>

(cherry picked from commit f89e245)
protectionsmachine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2024
Co-authored-by: shashank-elastic <91139415+shashank-elastic@users.noreply.github.com>

(cherry picked from commit f89e245)
protectionsmachine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2024
Co-authored-by: shashank-elastic <91139415+shashank-elastic@users.noreply.github.com>

(cherry picked from commit f89e245)
protectionsmachine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2024
Co-authored-by: shashank-elastic <91139415+shashank-elastic@users.noreply.github.com>

(cherry picked from commit f89e245)
protectionsmachine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2024
Co-authored-by: shashank-elastic <91139415+shashank-elastic@users.noreply.github.com>

(cherry picked from commit f89e245)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants