-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Obs AI Assistant] Add retry statements as an attempt to resolve flaky tests #200022
[Obs AI Assistant] Add retry statements as an attempt to resolve flaky tests #200022
Conversation
Pinging @elastic/obs-ai-assistant (Team:Obs AI Assistant) |
🤖 GitHub commentsExpand to view the GitHub comments
Just comment with:
|
7323649
to
60f4376
Compare
💚 Build Succeeded
Metrics [docs]
Historycc @viduni94 |
|
||
const instructions = res.body.userInstructions; | ||
const instructions = res.body.userInstructions; | ||
expect(instructions).to.have.length(3); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does expect
actually throw and is able to be caught and retried? If so, good!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Starting backport for target branches: 8.x |
…y tests (elastic#200022) Closes elastic#192222 ## Summary ### Problem The test appears to be flaky, potentially because the entries are not available at the time of retrieval. This cannot be reproduced locally or via the flaky test runner. (more details [here](elastic#196026 (comment))) ### Solution Add a retry when fetching the instructions and check whether the number of instructions returned by the API endpoint is the same number of instructions expected. ### Checklist - [x] [Flaky Test Runner](https://ci-stats.kibana.dev/trigger_flaky_test_runner/1) was used on any tests changed (cherry picked from commit 53c05a3)
💚 All backports created successfully
Note: Successful backport PRs will be merged automatically after passing CI. Questions ?Please refer to the Backport tool documentation |
…e flaky tests (#200022) (#200213) # Backport This will backport the following commits from `main` to `8.x`: - [[Obs AI Assistant] Add retry statements as an attempt to resolve flaky tests (#200022)](#200022) <!--- Backport version: 9.4.3 --> ### Questions ? Please refer to the [Backport tool documentation](https://github.com/sqren/backport) <!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Viduni Wickramarachchi","email":"viduni.wickramarachchi@elastic.co"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2024-11-14T16:09:42Z","message":"[Obs AI Assistant] Add retry statements as an attempt to resolve flaky tests (#200022)\n\nCloses https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/192222\r\n\r\n## Summary\r\n\r\n### Problem\r\nThe test appears to be flaky, potentially because the entries are not\r\navailable at the time of retrieval. This cannot be reproduced locally or\r\nvia the flaky test runner. (more details\r\n[here](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/196026#issuecomment-2409056856))\r\n\r\n### Solution\r\nAdd a retry when fetching the instructions and check whether the number\r\nof instructions returned by the API endpoint is the same number of\r\ninstructions expected.\r\n\r\n### Checklist\r\n\r\n- [x] [Flaky Test\r\nRunner](https://ci-stats.kibana.dev/trigger_flaky_test_runner/1) was\r\nused on any tests changed","sha":"53c05a33e7fe917b7d64b7d3ca664aaf3f9cf3ca","branchLabelMapping":{"^v9.0.0$":"main","^v8.17.0$":"8.x","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["release_note:enhancement","v9.0.0","Team:Obs AI Assistant","ci:project-deploy-observability","backport:version","v8.17.0"],"title":"[Obs AI Assistant] Add retry statements as an attempt to resolve flaky tests","number":200022,"url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/200022","mergeCommit":{"message":"[Obs AI Assistant] Add retry statements as an attempt to resolve flaky tests (#200022)\n\nCloses https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/192222\r\n\r\n## Summary\r\n\r\n### Problem\r\nThe test appears to be flaky, potentially because the entries are not\r\navailable at the time of retrieval. This cannot be reproduced locally or\r\nvia the flaky test runner. (more details\r\n[here](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/196026#issuecomment-2409056856))\r\n\r\n### Solution\r\nAdd a retry when fetching the instructions and check whether the number\r\nof instructions returned by the API endpoint is the same number of\r\ninstructions expected.\r\n\r\n### Checklist\r\n\r\n- [x] [Flaky Test\r\nRunner](https://ci-stats.kibana.dev/trigger_flaky_test_runner/1) was\r\nused on any tests changed","sha":"53c05a33e7fe917b7d64b7d3ca664aaf3f9cf3ca"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":["8.x"],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"main","label":"v9.0.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v9.0.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/200022","number":200022,"mergeCommit":{"message":"[Obs AI Assistant] Add retry statements as an attempt to resolve flaky tests (#200022)\n\nCloses https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/192222\r\n\r\n## Summary\r\n\r\n### Problem\r\nThe test appears to be flaky, potentially because the entries are not\r\navailable at the time of retrieval. This cannot be reproduced locally or\r\nvia the flaky test runner. (more details\r\n[here](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/196026#issuecomment-2409056856))\r\n\r\n### Solution\r\nAdd a retry when fetching the instructions and check whether the number\r\nof instructions returned by the API endpoint is the same number of\r\ninstructions expected.\r\n\r\n### Checklist\r\n\r\n- [x] [Flaky Test\r\nRunner](https://ci-stats.kibana.dev/trigger_flaky_test_runner/1) was\r\nused on any tests changed","sha":"53c05a33e7fe917b7d64b7d3ca664aaf3f9cf3ca"}},{"branch":"8.x","label":"v8.17.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v8.17.0$","isSourceBranch":false,"state":"NOT_CREATED"}]}] BACKPORT--> Co-authored-by: Viduni Wickramarachchi <viduni.wickramarachchi@elastic.co>
Closes #192222
Summary
Problem
The test appears to be flaky, potentially because the entries are not available at the time of retrieval. This cannot be reproduced locally or via the flaky test runner. (more details here)
Solution
Add a retry when fetching the instructions and check whether the number of instructions returned by the API endpoint is the same number of instructions expected.
Checklist