Add tests to methods

[fsargent]

No description provided.

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 1.37%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	4.15 ⭐	4.17 ⭐	0.02 👎
Method Length	199.64 😞	193.60 😞	-6.04 👍
Working memory	11.42 😞	10.62 😞	-0.80 👍
Quality	55.92% 🙂	57.29% 🙂	1.37% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	403	421	18

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
examples/ballot_generator.py	64.24% 🙂	62.73% 🙂	-1.51% 👎
examples/methods.py	55.42% 🙂	58.01% 🙂	2.59% 👍
tests/test_ballot_generator.py	51.22% 🙂	51.22% 🙂	0.00%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
examples/methods.py	STV	4 ⭐	237 ⛔	15 😞	44.12% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
tests/test_ballot_generator.py	MyTestCase.test_generate_ballot	0 ⭐	295 ⛔	16 ⛔	44.38% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
examples/methods.py	Allocated_Score	5 ⭐	245 ⛔	12 😞	46.94% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
tests/test_ballot_generator.py	MyTestCase.test_generate_ballot_multiple	21 😞	89 🙂	11 😞	50.05% 🙂	Refactor to reduce nesting. Extract out complex expressions
examples/methods.py	MES	4 ⭐	139 😞	13 😞	54.94% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!