Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Power budget #15

Open
kaolpr opened this issue Jun 4, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

Power budget #15

kaolpr opened this issue Jun 4, 2020 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@kaolpr
Copy link
Member

kaolpr commented Jun 4, 2020

Power budget must be created taking into account the power requirements of FMC and RTM standards.

The technique of creating is not important, however, please attach all files to the project repository.

Please include values from standards and power supply margin on every rail in percent of value required by the standard.

@kaolpr kaolpr added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 4, 2020
@kaolpr kaolpr added this to the AFCZ v1.1 milestone Jun 4, 2020
@gkasprow
Copy link
Collaborator

gkasprow commented Jun 4, 2020

Use Analog devices Power CAD tool and incude all LDOs, regulators, etc https://www.analog.com/en/design-center/ltpowercad.html

@filipswit
Copy link
Collaborator

Do we have any approximations for ZU7 power consumption per rail? And maybe logs from XRs?
That would be useful in case of research for new power supply solution - #18 .

@gkasprow
Copy link
Collaborator

gkasprow commented Jun 5, 2020

What is wrong with existing power solution?
Just repace the Exar chips with older 7725 which work just fine.

@kaolpr
Copy link
Member Author

kaolpr commented Jun 8, 2020

#18 is closed. We're staying with XR-s.

@gkasprow I'm bumping a topic of power usage estimation for ZU7. If none exists we'll try to use Xilinx PE. Either way, if #31 is to be implemented we'll have to do it for ZU11.

@marmeladapk
Copy link

Bumping again.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants