-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 332
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Auto load more pages when running apply mode #291
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ProcessRulesContent
participant DataFetcher
User->>ProcessRulesContent: Trigger Run All
ProcessRulesContent->>DataFetcher: Fetch initial page
DataFetcher-->>ProcessRulesContent: Return page data
ProcessRulesContent->>ProcessRulesContent: Process messages
alt More pages available
ProcessRulesContent->>DataFetcher: Fetch next page
DataFetcher-->>ProcessRulesContent: Return additional data
end
ProcessRulesContent->>User: Complete processing
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/ProcessRules.tsx (2)
51-51
: Use ofmutate
can introduce race conditionsRetrieving the updated data with
mutate()
while also callingsetSize()
may cause overlapping requests if triggered multiple times in quick succession. Consider adding guards or checks to mitigate potential race conditions or unexpected state transitions.
114-115
: ExtractPAGE_LIMIT
to a configurable constantDefining a magic number inside the component can limit flexibility if you need to adjust the page limit in the future. Consider placing
PAGE_LIMIT
in a config file or accepting it as a prop to make it more maintainable.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/ProcessRules.tsx
(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/ProcessRules.tsx (1)
63-63
: Simplified pagination callback looks goodThe concise arrow function for incrementing the page size via
setSize
is clean and straightforward. Good job.
for (let page = 0; page < PAGE_LIMIT; page++) { | ||
// Get current data, only fetch if we don't have this page yet | ||
let currentData = data; | ||
if (!currentData?.[page]) { | ||
await setSize((size) => size + 1); | ||
currentData = await mutate(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
const currentBatch = currentData?.[page]?.messages || []; | ||
|
||
for (const message of currentBatch) { | ||
if (!isRunningAllRef.current) break; | ||
if (results[message.id]) continue; | ||
await onRun(message); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Check if we got new data in the last request | ||
const lastPage = currentData?.[page]; | ||
if (!lastPage?.nextPageToken || !isRunningAllRef.current) break; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for pagination and data fetching operations
The code review concerns are valid. While the code handles basic error cases through SWR's error states, the pagination and mutation operations in the handleRunAll
function lack proper error handling:
- The sequential
setSize
andmutate
calls are not wrapped in a try-catch block - The code continues execution even if
currentData
is undefined after mutation - There's no validation of the mutation response
Here are the specific locations that need attention:
apps/web/app/(app)/automation/ProcessRules.tsx
lines 116-120:
let currentData = data;
if (!currentData?.[page]) {
await setSize((size) => size + 1);
currentData = await mutate();
}
Should include error handling:
try {
let currentData = data;
if (!currentData?.[page]) {
await setSize((size) => size + 1);
currentData = await mutate();
if (!currentData?.[page]) {
throw new Error("Failed to fetch page data");
}
}
} catch (error) {
handleStop();
toastError({
title: "Error processing emails",
description: error.message
});
break;
}
🔗 Analysis chain
Handle potential errors and concurrency issues when paginating
The loop for fetching additional pages based on PAGE_LIMIT
works, but here are some considerations:
- Error handling: If
mutate()
fails or returns an error, the loop continues. You may want to break early or handle the error to prevent reading fromundefined
data. - Concurrency: Double-check that
isRunningAllRef
and the updates frommutate()
don’t cause unexpected race conditions if a user manually triggers other pagination or runs the rules from a different flow. - Performance: Repeatedly calling
await onRun(message)
for each message could be time-consuming for large pages. Consider parallelizing if your backend can handle it.
Based on the search results, I can see that setSize
and mutate
are part of the SWR (React Hooks for Data Fetching) library's API. The code follows the recommended patterns for pagination and data mutation:
setSize
is used to load the next page of datamutate
is used to revalidate/refresh the data after changes- The code properly awaits both operations sequentially
Let's verify the error handling:
Let me fix the regex and try again:
Let me try a different approach to check the error handling:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for potential concurrency calls to `setSize` or `mutate` in the codebase outside this file.
# Rationale: We want to confirm that these calls aren't triggered simultaneously, which may cause race conditions.
rg -A 5 'setSize|mutate'
Length of output: 66159
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for try-catch blocks around mutate calls in the file
rg -A 5 "try.*{" apps/web/app/\(app\)/automation/ProcessRules.tsx
Length of output: 143
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for try-catch blocks around mutate calls in the file
rg -A 5 "try \{" "apps/web/app/(app)/automation/ProcessRules.tsx"
# Also search for error handling patterns
rg "if.*error|catch|throw" "apps/web/app/(app)/automation/ProcessRules.tsx"
Length of output: 145
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full content of the file to analyze error handling
cat "apps/web/app/(app)/automation/ProcessRules.tsx"
# Also check if there are any error handling patterns in similar pagination implementations
rg -A 5 "setSize.*size.*\+ 1.*mutate"
Length of output: 9566
Summary by CodeRabbit