Support otel export only flag

[fractalwrench]

Goal

Adds a new flag to the config with the key sdk_config.otel_export_only. The intention is that customers who don't want to send data to Embrace can set this flag to true, and the SDK will avoid sending any data to Embrace. This also alters what bytecode we instrument (i.e. data limits).

Testing

Added an integration test that confirms this workflow isn't broken.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 70.58824% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 85.46%. Comparing base (1d3cd32) to head (c0e99af).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...mbracesdk/internal/injection/DeliveryModuleImpl.kt	55.55%	0 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
.../embracesdk/internal/injection/ConfigModuleImpl.kt	75.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           simplify-limits    #1747      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            85.29%   85.46%   +0.17%     
===================================================
  Files                  464      464              
  Lines                10754    10756       +2     
  Branches              1589     1588       -1     
===================================================
+ Hits                  9173     9193      +20     
  Misses                 870      870              
+ Partials               711      693      -18     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...id/embracesdk/internal/config/ConfigServiceImpl.kt	96.15% <100.00%> (+0.15%)	⬆️
...config/instrumented/schema/EnabledFeatureConfig.kt	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...nal/config/instrumented/schema/OtelLimitsConfig.kt	100.00% <ø> (ø)
.../embracesdk/internal/injection/ConfigModuleImpl.kt	93.18% <75.00%> (+8.73%)	⬆️
...mbracesdk/internal/injection/DeliveryModuleImpl.kt	77.14% <55.55%> (+0.21%)	⬆️

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

[bidetofevil]

LGTM