Change sdk enabled logic to mimic android and backend

[pablomatiasgomez]

Checklist

We want to have the exact same logic (than android and backend) to decide if the SDK is enabled or not.
The - 1 is because otherwise you can never get a value of 100.

• PR Description to summarize changes
• Add sufficient test coverage
• Read Contributing Guidelines
• Agree to Embrace CLA

[github-actions]

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

Package	Version	Score	Details

Scanned Files

[github-actions]

	Warnings
⚠️	No CHANGELOG entry added.
⚠️	No tests added / modified.

Generated by 🚫 Danger Swift against 8de4f98

[notion-workspace]

Apply sampling logic when reading sdk enabled from config service

[notion-workspace]

Apply sampling logic when reading sdk enabled from config service

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.54%. Comparing base (1dcd83c) to head (8de4f98).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #141      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.64%   90.54%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files         417      418       +1     
  Lines       27877    27957      +80     
==========================================
+ Hits        25269    25314      +45     
- Misses       2608     2643      +35     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...figInternal/EmbraceConfigurable/RemoteConfig.swift	93.54% <100.00%> (+0.44%)	⬆️

... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes