Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: CXF-96058: Onboard Fabric API Spec to Shared Equinix-Python-SDK #6

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 23, 2024

Conversation

jkallem-equinix
Copy link
Contributor

Onboard Fabric API Spec to Shared Equinix-Python-SDK

…lid any type. * Add custom portResponseProject for customer bug fix until all PDS accounts are migrated. * Remove required field from project model until API fixes response for PDS Users. * Remove required field from port response.
@jkallem-equinix jkallem-equinix requested a review from a team as a code owner July 17, 2024 03:38
@jkallem-equinix jkallem-equinix changed the title CXF-96058: Onboard Fabric API Spec to Shared Equinix-Python-SDK feat: CXF-96058: Onboard Fabric API Spec to Shared Equinix-Python-SDK Jul 17, 2024
@ctreatma
Copy link
Contributor

@jkallem-equinix Looks good! Could you add the following line to .github/CODEOWNERS so that your team will have permission to review future Fabric PRs to this SDK:

*fabricv*               @equinix/governor-digin-fabric

@jkallem-equinix
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jkallem-equinix Looks good! Could you add the following line to .github/CODEOWNERS so that your team will have permission to review future Fabric PRs to this SDK:

*fabricv*               @equinix/governor-digin-fabric

@jkallem-equinix
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done with the .github/CODEOWNERS. Please Review.

@ctreatma ctreatma merged commit 699198e into main Jul 23, 2024
1 check passed
@ctreatma ctreatma deleted the CXF-96058 branch July 23, 2024 13:30
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is included in version 0.2.0 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants