Add gte?/2 and lte?/2 #205
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
wojtekmach
approved these changes
Apr 2, 2024
ericmj
approved these changes
Apr 2, 2024
ericmj
changed the title
gte?/2 and lte?/2 (and fix small typos on gt/lt docs)
|
Thank you! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
as asked in this issue: #204
and I tried to keep it very similar to
gt?/2andlt?/2both "doc-wise" and "test-wise".I used a custom version of these functions a lot in another project so I thought it'd make sense to also add it here.
it's a common use case for "decimal libs" in other stacks. 😃