Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deploy setup + esm test update #3

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Mar 21, 2024
Merged

deploy setup + esm test update #3

merged 9 commits into from
Mar 21, 2024

Conversation

erikyo
Copy link
Owner

@erikyo erikyo commented Mar 20, 2024

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@e0f20d7). Click here to learn what that means.

❗ Current head 63f2d71 differs from pull request most recent head 383a03e. Consider uploading reports for the commit 383a03e to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master       #3   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   77.00%           
=========================================
  Files             ?        7           
  Lines             ?      200           
  Branches          ?       34           
=========================================
  Hits              ?      154           
  Misses            ?       44           
  Partials          ?        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@erikyo erikyo changed the title deploy setup (jest config) deploy setup + esm test update Mar 21, 2024
@erikyo erikyo merged commit 7bcba71 into master Mar 21, 2024
12 checks passed
@erikyo erikyo deleted the deploy branch March 21, 2024 07:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants