Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Old eslint version referenced in npm-published v1.5.0 #174

Open
mosermanuel opened this issue Feb 4, 2016 · 4 comments
Open

Old eslint version referenced in npm-published v1.5.0 #174

mosermanuel opened this issue Feb 4, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@mosermanuel
Copy link

Version 1.5.0, which is published in the global npm-repository (https://www.npmjs.com/package/plato), has an old eslint version referenced (^0.7.4). This makes plato unpossible to use with current versions of eslint. Is there a way to publish a new version of plato, with a new eslint version referenced (like in master)?

Thx!

@mosermanuel mosermanuel changed the title Old eslint version referenced in npm-published 1.5.0 Old eslint version referenced in npm-published v1.5.0 Feb 4, 2016
@p-bakker
Copy link

Ran into this as well, looks like more dependancies are out of date: https://www.versioneye.com/nodejs/plato/1.5.0

The version of fs-extra is so old, that is it incompatible with newer versions of Node.

I also wonder about Plato version 1.5.0 being availabel on NPM, while if I look under Releases in this repository on gitHub, the latest release is v1.2.1, with 3 newer tags going up to v1.4.0. No mention of a v1.5.0 in this repo at all. Wondering what is actually published on NPM

@syke80
Copy link

syke80 commented Jun 6, 2016

Hi Guys, (The Maintainers)

Could you please drop a comment here with an ETA on proposed resolution?
It's getting a quite important on some projects as ESLint is at v2.11.1

Thanks a lot!

@mosermanuel
Copy link
Author

Hi Guys,

are there any plans for that task?

Thanks!

@jsoverson
Copy link
Member

Sorry all, haven't been on top of github issues for some time. This project is (obviously) pretty much unmaintained right now and could use both someone to keep v1 alive (with PRs like this) and someone to advance it to modern best practices in a v2.

Any takers?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants