You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If the optional on clause is specified, it may only employ the = equals operator and property names.
Any other operators must be placed in the where-clause. The stream names that appear in the
on clause may refer to any stream in the from-clause
resulting in different results when the where-clause is used because the on-clause only supports ='s since the semantics are different.
When making OUTER JOINs (ANSI-89 or ANSI-92), filtration location matters because criteria specified in the ON clause is applied before the JOIN is made. Criteria against an OUTER JOINed table provided in the WHERE clause is applied after the JOIN is made. This can produce very different result sets. In comparison, it doesn't matter for INNER JOINs if the criteria is provided in the ON or WHERE clauses -- the result will be the same.
This feature request is to add full support for other operators within the on clause.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
dakotahNorth
changed the title
Add support for binary results in left outer join on clause
Add support for full set of operators in left outer join on clause
Nov 1, 2022
dakotahNorth
changed the title
Add support for full set of operators in left outer join on clause
Support for full set of operators in left outer join on clause
Nov 2, 2022
Esper documentation states
resulting in different results when the where-clause is used because the on-clause only supports ='s since the semantics are different.
From https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4752455/left-join-with-where-clause
This feature request is to add full support for other operators within the on clause.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: