tests(sinsp): Fix infer_defaults_to_first_non_loopback TC

[SohamM-Ibm]

What type of PR is this?

/kind failing-test

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

/area tests

Does this PR require a change in the driver versions?

No

What this PR does / why we need it:

We need to ensure the same byte order for all architectures, so added the Byte order modifiers.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

[poiana]

Welcome @SohamM-Ibm! It looks like this is your first PR to falcosecurity/libs 🎉

[SohamM-Ibm]

The PR resolves the Test case failure observed on s390x system for sinsp_network_interfaces.infer_defaults_to_first_non_loopback while running the command - make run-unit-test-libsinsp.

[ RUN      ] sinsp_network_interfaces.infer_defaults_to_first_non_loopback
/home/test/sysdig/build/falcosecurity-libs-repo/falcosecurity-libs-prefix/src/falcosecurity-libs/userspace/libsinsp/test/ifinfo.ut.cpp:126: Failure
Expected equality of these values:
  "192.168.22.149"
  buf
    Which is: "127.0.0.1"

[  FAILED  ] sinsp_network_interfaces.infer_defaults_to_first_non_loopback (0 ms)
[----------] 6 tests from sinsp_network_interfaces (0 ms total)

[SohamM-Ibm]

@Andreagit97 May you please review.

[LucaGuerra]

/milestone 0.18.0

[github-actions]

Perf diff from master - unit tests

     5.70%     -1.43%  [.] sinsp_evt::get_type
     2.58%     +0.91%  [.] sinsp_thread_manager::find_thread
     4.68%     +0.83%  [.] next
     9.17%     +0.66%  [.] sinsp_parser::reset
     1.62%     +0.66%  [.] scap_event_decode_params
     1.20%     +0.58%  [.] sinsp::fetch_next_event
     8.10%     -0.50%  [.] sinsp::next
     0.90%     +0.50%  [.] libsinsp::sinsp_suppress::process_event
     0.18%     +0.49%  [.] sinsp_container_info::sinsp_container_info
     5.34%     -0.45%  [.] sinsp_parser::process_event

Perf diff from master - scap file

     5.31%     +8.92%  [.] sinsp_filter_check::tostring
     5.20%     +7.36%  [.] sinsp_filter_check_event::extract_single
    11.55%     -4.65%  [.] next
     2.64%     +4.30%  [.] std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char const*>
    12.61%     -3.87%  [.] sinsp_filter_check::extract_nocache
     7.93%     -3.78%  [.] std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_construct<char*>
    11.83%     -3.26%  [.] sinsp_evt_formatter::tostring_withformat
     8.08%     -2.33%  [.] sinsp_filter_check::rawval_to_string
     5.59%     -2.20%  [.] scap_event_decode_params
     7.84%     -2.20%  [.] std::_Hashtable<long, std::pair<long const, std::shared_ptr<sinsp_threadinfo> >, std::allocator<std::pair<long const, std::shared_ptr<sinsp_threadinfo> > >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<long>, std::hash<long>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<false, false, true> >::_M_find_before_node

Heap diff from master - unit tests

peak heap memory consumption: 0B
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B

Heap diff from master - scap file

peak heap memory consumption: 0B
peak RSS (including heaptrack overhead): 0B
total memory leaked: 0B

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 50.98%. Comparing base (2e87063) to head (1b2f028).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #1989    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   50.98%   50.98%            
========================================
  Files         310      310            
  Lines       39612    39612            
  Branches    17455    17626   +171     
========================================
  Hits        20197    20197            
- Misses      14338    14354    +16     
+ Partials     5077     5061    -16     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Andreagit97]

Thank you for this!
/approve

[poiana]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 0af7d27660890d95e3f8b1a8041cbf38f969edf6

[poiana]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Andreagit97, SohamM-Ibm

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [Andreagit97]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment