Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Need more test cases #35

Open
F30 opened this issue Jun 15, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Need more test cases #35

F30 opened this issue Jun 15, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
improvement Not a critical bug, but also not a visible feature

Comments

@F30
Copy link
Member

F30 commented Jun 15, 2018 •
edited
Loading

I know this is a far stretch and writing test cases is lots of work. But currently our only really test is running a FAUST CTF and that's not a satisfying situation.

For example, stuff like #34 is a complete poking in the dark.

So maybe, just maybe, we could get test cases for all components at some point?
@F30 F30 added the improvement Not a critical bug, but also not a visible feature label Jun 15, 2018
@F30 F30 mentioned this issue Jun 15, 2018
Closed
F30 added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 3, 2020
@F30
Major rewrite of everything related to Checkers
babf7a1 
* New API and library for Checker Scripts
* Build foundation for Checker Scripts in other languages (IPC
  protocol)
* Checker Scripts can be executed locally (during development) without
  a dedicated Runner
* No more Checker Slaves
* Launch processes using Python multiprocessing instead of asyncio
* Scheduling of checks within a tick is different, should lead to more
  even distribution
* Run Checker Scripts as different users than the Checker Master
* Lots of test cases

Closes: #1
Closes: #20
Closes: #33
Closes: #38
Improves: #17
Improves: #27
Improves: #29
Improves: #32
Improves: #35
@F30
Copy link
Member Author

F30 commented Apr 18, 2022

Fixed for submission through 6e94105.

@F30 F30 closed this as completed Apr 18, 2022
@F30 F30 reopened this Apr 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
improvement Not a critical bug, but also not a visible feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@F30