Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DX Streamline] Lean NI-PoRep integration testing #12009

Closed
rvagg opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #12017
Closed

[DX Streamline] Lean NI-PoRep integration testing #12009

rvagg opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #12017
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented May 17, 2024

As part of the effort to decouple lotus node development from lotus-miner development, this task aims to implement integration testing of the FIP-0090 (and likely FIP-0092) NI-PoRep feature without requiring full lotus-miner implementation of the feature. This will likely lead to changes in the itest kit setup and more verbose testing in the short term, but a better understanding of the longer-term implications of decoupling.

@rvagg rvagg added this to the DX-Streamline milestone May 17, 2024
@rvagg rvagg self-assigned this May 17, 2024
@rvagg rvagg added this to FilOz May 17, 2024
@rvagg rvagg moved this to ⌨️In Progress in FilOz May 17, 2024
@rjan90
Copy link
Contributor

rjan90 commented Jun 6, 2024

Reopening this ticket.

#12017 delivered the generic testkit manual miner that can be used to onboard CC sectors and Snap deal sectors which was a pre-requisite for the lean NI-PoRep integration testing.

#12105 is planned to deliver the NI-PoRep part.

@rjan90 rjan90 reopened this Jun 6, 2024
@rjan90 rjan90 moved this from ⌨️In Progress to 🎉 Done in FilOz Jul 29, 2024
@rjan90
Copy link
Contributor

rjan90 commented Jul 29, 2024

Closing as this has been completed

@rjan90 rjan90 closed this as completed Jul 29, 2024
@rjan90 rjan90 moved this from 🎉 Done to ☑️Done (Archive) in FilOz Aug 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: ☑️ Done (Archive)
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants