Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

curio web: node info page #11745

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 25, 2024
Merged

curio web: node info page #11745

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 25, 2024

Conversation

magik6k
Copy link
Contributor

@magik6k magik6k commented Mar 19, 2024

Related Issues

Proposed Changes

This PR adds a "Node Info" page to the webui, adding a feature which never existed in lotus - per node storage stats view!

Additional Info

2024-03-19-164511_1137x924_scrot

Checklist

Before you mark the PR ready for review, please make sure that:

  • Commits have a clear commit message.
  • PR title is in the form of of <PR type>: <area>: <change being made>
    • example: fix: mempool: Introduce a cache for valid signatures
    • PR type: fix, feat, build, chore, ci, docs, perf, refactor, revert, style, test
    • area, e.g. api, chain, state, market, mempool, multisig, networking, paych, proving, sealing, wallet, deps
  • If the PR affects users (e.g., new feature, bug fix, system requirements change), update the CHANGELOG.md and add details to the UNRELEASED section.
  • New features have usage guidelines and / or documentation updates in
  • Tests exist for new functionality or change in behavior
  • CI is green

@magik6k magik6k requested a review from snadrus March 19, 2024 15:50
curiosrc/web/hapi/routes.go Show resolved Hide resolved
curiosrc/web/hapi/routes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@snadrus snadrus merged commit 099fc04 into master Mar 25, 2024
98 checks passed
@snadrus snadrus deleted the feat/curioweb-nodeinfo branch March 25, 2024 15:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants