We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Why are the estimation results of stereosgm_movie.cpp and stereosgm_image.cpp different?
When the SGM parameters of stereosgm_image are imported as they are and operated as stereosgm_movie.cpp, a completely different result is obtained.
Could you please tell me if there is something I overlooked?
Of course, we know that moive.cpp is a CUDA implementation, and image.cpp does not use cuda programming.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Why are the estimation results of stereosgm_movie.cpp and stereosgm_image.cpp different?
When the SGM parameters of stereosgm_image are imported as they are and operated as stereosgm_movie.cpp, a completely different result is obtained.
Could you please tell me if there is something I overlooked?
Of course, we know that moive.cpp is a CUDA implementation, and image.cpp does not use cuda programming.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: