Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
We're planning a test run of very basic lsp support after version 0.4.0.
If it proves to be a problem we will remove it.
…On Mon, Oct 14, 2024, 12:04 AM rathewolf ***@***.***> wrote:
i understand the editor wants to stay lean, and i'm afraid an lsp may be
too heavy, but i wonder, are ctags light-weight enough..?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#446>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4OX77USRQQR6UXSBWWLULDZ3JHSXAVCNFSM6AAAAABP3KO3F2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ERDJONRXK43TNFXW4OZXGMYTENZSGM>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
ooooh, wow. i.. did not expect that..! amazing!! i love how many little design nuances there are.. 😄 yeah, i partly ask because i've got a weird case of a game scripting lang that doesn't have an lsp, just ctags 😢 but lsp is def the way to go..! i guess i'll close this, as ctags is pretty much deprecated. 🫤 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
i understand the editor wants to stay lean, and i'm afraid an lsp may be too heavy, but i wonder, are ctags light-weight enough..?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions