Migrate search mode from Priority to Mincost #646
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
The behavior I expect to see matches your description. I would clarify/rephrase "1. if no purchased order need, consumed confirmed manufacturing orders in order of priority" as follows. If there is stock or confirmed purchase orders on any of the alternate materials, frepple will consume that supply first before proposing a new purchase order. This use-up search uses the priority indeed. Once the existing supply is all used up, the algorithm will in step 3 choose purchasing from the cheapest supplier that can meet the requirement date. Note that if the cheapest supplier has a very long lead time, the algorithm will buy from more expensive suppliers that have a shorter lead time. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Assumed that I have a route.
In specific operation A, defined multiple input items in operation materials with different priority.
All these items have item suppliers in their upstream operations.
If I defined cost in item suppliers and change 'search' in operation materials from 'PRIORITY' to 'MINCOST'
expected below planning process happened:
briefly speaking, would 'MINCOST' keeps 'PRIORITY' behaviors if not conflicts?
or it is a must to convert alternative items defined in operation materials to multiple alternative operations?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions