ci(reprotest-wheels): switch to Debian bullseye #358
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…lseye:2022_05_10) Now that we're assuming Python 3.9 under Debian bullseye, that's the environment we should use for testing wheel-level reproducibility. Closes #350.
legoktm
approved these changes
Jul 5, 2022
|
@legoktm - since this is a major blocker, I think it's fine to rely on CI for testing that we can still build wheels reproducibly and for you to merge (I am scheduling a retro now about why this failed so we can go into more detail later). |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Now that we're assuming Python 3.9 under Debian bullseye, that's the
environment we should use for testing wheel-level reproducibility.
Closes #350.
Test plan
reprotest-wheelspasses (along with the rest of CI).packaging-debian-bullseyeimage per Add a bullseye builder #317 (review).