Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[24.0] Extend regex groups in stdio regex matches #17016

Merged

Conversation

bernt-matthias
Copy link
Contributor

@bernt-matthias bernt-matthias commented Nov 13, 2023

Allow to extend groups in the matching regex in the description.

Wondering where to description is shown? Is this broken? The screenshot shows the job info page which shows that the Job Messages are shown as dict and the job details in the history show An error has occurred with this dataset.

Screenshot from 2023-11-13 15-30-29

How to test the changes?

(Select all options that apply)

  • I've included appropriate automated tests.
  • This is a refactoring of components with existing test coverage.
  • Instructions for manual testing are as follows:
    1. [add testing steps and prerequisites here if you didn't write automated tests covering all your changes]

License

  • I agree to license these and all my past contributions to the core galaxy codebase under the MIT license.

lib/galaxy/metadata/set_metadata.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
lib/galaxy/metadata/set_metadata.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jmchilton
Copy link
Member

The failing test seems relevant. Very exciting work though - this is awesome.

@bgruening
Copy link
Member

Should we use CDTA in the examples?

@bernt-matthias
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @mvdbeek :)

@bgruening CDTA?

@bernt-matthias
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think we can't use CTATA in attributes, isn't it?

@bernt-matthias
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hujambo-dunia could you have a look at the failing client unit test?

@jdavcs
Copy link
Member

jdavcs commented Mar 4, 2024

I think the 2 last commits that touch the JobInformation.vue file are incorrect (e0039f7 and 91eb773): they override the changes introduced in #17566.
Also, the last commit which is empty can be dropped.

@hujambo-dunia
Copy link
Contributor

I think the 2 last commits that touch the JobInformation.vue file are incorrect (e0039f7 and 91eb773): they override the changes introduced in #17566. Also, the last commit which is empty can be dropped.

Agreed - I see what you're saying, including JohnC's commits from 5 days ago getting dropped in my last merge, and will make those adjustments shortly.

@jdavcs
Copy link
Member

jdavcs commented Mar 4, 2024

I'm sorry for being the annoying one here! Here's the thing: those 2 commits I mentioned are still present, and they take the code into a broken state. Even though it's for a short span of 3 commits, fixed in the forth, it is not ideal: the history doesn't tell a coherent story, and if anyone happens to end up on one of those commits (a checkout, a pause in a rebase, etc.), they may be confused.

The fix is simple: reorder the commits, so that those two are followed by the fix. Then squash the three into one. Then you'll have one commit that handles those changes, without any do/undo parts.

bernt-matthias and others added 2 commits March 5, 2024 10:00
…ent upgrade)

Upgraded component to Vue 3. Extra space removed.
Remove index enumeration and indentation; separate multiple errors with border line instead. Prevent metadata from printing when there is no value.
Rebased and edited/removed accidental 'merge conflict markers' in file
@mvdbeek mvdbeek changed the base branch from dev to release_24.0 March 5, 2024 15:19
@mvdbeek mvdbeek changed the title Extend regex groups in stdio regex matches [24.0] Extend regex groups in stdio regex matches Mar 5, 2024
@jdavcs
Copy link
Member

jdavcs commented Mar 5, 2024

@hujambo-dunia The rebase look correct - thank you!

Co-authored-by: M Bernt <m.bernt@ufz.de>
Copy link
Member

@jdavcs jdavcs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Waiting for the tests before merging (there may will be failures that are unrelated). Thanks again for addressing the comments and handling the rebase, @hujambo-dunia!

@hujambo-dunia
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good to me. Waiting for the tests before merging (there may will be failures that are unrelated). Thanks again for addressing the comments and handling the rebase, @hujambo-dunia!

@jdavcs it helps to have such a great teacher!

@jdavcs
Copy link
Member

jdavcs commented Mar 5, 2024

Can you, please, take a look at the client linting error?

@jdavcs jdavcs merged commit 5e05e00 into galaxyproject:release_24.0 Mar 5, 2024
40 of 44 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants