You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be great for a tutorial using a workflow available on IWC/WorkflowHub to avoid adding the workflow to the tutorial but give its ID and that the workflow on WorkflowHub is displayed for the metadata on the top and that the tests from IWC are used
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As long as the WF is referenced in the tutorial (through one of the existing snippets) that will be easy to detect and won't require any additional author supplied metadata
while we are in parallel going to upload workflows to WFH ourselves this definitely makes sense to do, but yes will require some new code to
detect that they're using those workflows
on build, download a copy of the workflow
so we can inspect which tools it uses (which might inflate download stats for better or worse) and use our existing mechanisms to compare against servers
and then exceptions in relevant places so we don't try and link to an ephemerally downloaded file.
It would be great for a tutorial using a workflow available on IWC/WorkflowHub to avoid adding the workflow to the tutorial but give its ID and that the workflow on WorkflowHub is displayed for the metadata on the top and that the tests from IWC are used
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: