-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add LibreSSL patch for app-crypt/mit-krb5 #577
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
blucybrb14de
commented
Oct 31, 2024
•
edited
Loading
edited
- Fixes app-crypt/mit-krb5 emake failed #571 , as it does not appear that the error here, is due to cryptographic functions used by LibreSSL.
- It appears that the error is also consistent with ppc, using openssl for that user.
- It seem to show that it builds successfully, with the tests on my end, with realm trust path navigation, and ticket granting ticket retrieval working as expected.
- Fixes it as a build dependency for other packages.
With all due honesty I am a little hesitant to proceed yet when the tests fail for different reasons for both of us and your test case is blocked for yet another reason... |
After re-testing, and taking a look at the error, it seems that it is likely caused by my configuration because of the last line.
It appears that there is a missing parameter that causes it to fail with USE=test. I just put this test configuration together, based off of what I could find online. Here is the configuration, that I am currently using:
Is anyone able to provide their configuration to see, if they are either able to reproduce this, or if I am able to test some other configuration, just to eliminate the possibility of it being related to LibreSSL, or if this is sufficient to proceed? |
The basic problem is lacking some way to test that mit-krb5 is not entirely broken at runtime with LibreSSL. Generally the tests would help here, but given the number of test failures in the Gentoo issue tracker and how we are both failing for different reasons I am skeptical how useful they are. Alternatively knowing dotnet-sdk and your own personal use case works would probably be good enough to make sure mit-krb5 at least somewhat works. |