Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HeatShield: The next one (R1->R2) #45

Open
gergelytakacs opened this issue Apr 26, 2018 · 6 comments
Open

HeatShield: The next one (R1->R2) #45

gergelytakacs opened this issue Apr 26, 2018 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request hardware Hardware related topic heat HeatShield

Comments

@gergelytakacs
Copy link
Owner

gergelytakacs commented Apr 26, 2018

Please include all hardware design ideas and "bugs" that can be improved upon in the next revision. Provide ideas for upcoming work.

@gergelytakacs gergelytakacs added enhancement New feature or request hardware Hardware related topic heat HeatShield labels Apr 26, 2018
@gergelytakacs
Copy link
Owner Author

gergelytakacs commented Apr 26, 2018

Has no reference pot. A small reference pot, probably "standing" version could be included. Shaft can possibly exit the safety enclosure, see #19

@gergelytakacs
Copy link
Owner Author

Limit the temperature (hardware) not (only) the power into the actuator.

@gergelytakacs
Copy link
Owner Author

Include another thermocouple for monitoring ambient temperture, would make the model (and its identification) possibly more engaging.

@gergelytakacs
Copy link
Owner Author

Adding a fan or mounting a Peltier device for thermoelectric cooling could either add another input to the system or act as a repeatable way to inject disturbance into the closed-loop control process.

@gergelytakacs
Copy link
Owner Author

Adding an alternate input function that takes heat power in W instead of percents. Can be done according to the PWM signal RMS, that is P=(V_avg)^2/R * (Ton/Tperiod)

@gergelytakacs
Copy link
Owner Author

  • Possibly more power could be given to the system, this one is a bit too slow for my taste. To balance safety / speed of operation is an issue.
  • The voltage regulator overheats really badly. It is actually hotter than the hot end!:))) So.... One argument can be that the hotend can reach its level if it's there anyway or it needs better cooling.
  • Could a fan be integrated to speed up cooling? Or a peltier cooler. But then that would not be a 3D printer head anymore.

@gergelytakacs gergelytakacs changed the title HeatShield: The next one HeatShield: The next one (R1->R2) May 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request hardware Hardware related topic heat HeatShield
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants