CSUB-518: GATE -> CTC Swap

[zacharyfrederick]

Description of proposed changes

---

Practical tips for PR review & merge:

• All GitHub Actions report PASS
• Newly added code/functions have unit tests
  • Coverage tools report all newly added lines as covered
  • The positive scenario is exercised
  • Negative scenarios are exercised, e.g. assert on all possible errors
  • Assert on events triggered if applicable
  • Assert on changes made to storage if applicable
• Modified behavior/functions - try to make sure above test items are covered
• Integration tests are added if applicable/needed

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1256 (b4f6d40) into dev (0f33230) will decrease coverage by 61.72%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on dev.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev   #1256       +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.92%   8.20%   -61.72%     
==========================================
  Files         103      28       -75     
  Lines       12098     902    -11196     
  Branches      112     112               
==========================================
- Hits         8459      74     -8385     
+ Misses       3630     828     -2802     
+ Partials        9       0        -9     

see 83 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[github-actions]

For full LLVM coverage report click here!

[atodorov]

Missing a few more unit tests (+ a few more not listed) but I can work on those once this ticket lands in READY FOR QA.

[atodorov]

Something is off with integration-test-loan-cycle. I am currently debugging to see why it fails and will post my findings here, when ready.

Meanwhile I think we should not merge with a failing CI job, especially when not needed for the upcoming release.