feat: add gnoffee PoC #1092
Closed
feat: add gnoffee PoC #1092
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Manfred Touron <94029+moul@users.noreply.github.com>
moul
force-pushed
the
dev/moul/gnoffee
branch
from
68a5d30
to
a63ca1b
Compare
Signed-off-by: Manfred Touron <94029+moul@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Manfred Touron <94029+moul@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Manfred Touron <94029+moul@users.noreply.github.com>
|
A next step would be to add support for *int128,256 |
This was referenced Sep 4, 2023
moul
added a commit
to gnoverse/gnoffee
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2023
Signed-off-by: Manfred Touron <94029+moul@users.noreply.github.com>
Merged
|
Will continue here -> gnoverse/gnoffee#1 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm pondering a few things about our setup:
misc/,gnovm/, new top-level namespace, or its own repo?gno?.gnoffeefiles and gives us output. You can see it on screen or save it using-w. But here's the twist: it currently blends the new bits with all the.gnoffeescripts, creating a full.gofile. Another idea is to just pinpoint and add what's missing, resulting in agnoffee.gen.gofile. I'm weighing up both approaches and would appreciate your insights.Any feedback or even a chat about it would be great. cc @gnolang/tech-staff @gnolang/core-contributors
Suggestion for reviewers: checkout the txtar tests: https://github.com/gnolang/gno/pull/1092/files#diff-a9299fce0ae91a6a0eb6e0bfc51ab83a51116d452703e4c82f473f1e933dff4f
Addresses gnolang/hackerspace#22
Addresses #1075
Depends on #1093 (tests fail on go1.19)
Contributors' checklist...
BREAKING CHANGE: xxxmessage was included in the description