Default to tiny bet in DeployableTraderAgent #465
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
prediction_market_agent_tooling/deploy/agent.py (2)
310-313: LGTM! Consider adding a comment explaining the tiny bet strategy.The change to use
market.get_tiny_bet_amount().amountinstead of calculating based on user balance is a good simplification. It aligns well with the PR objective of defaulting to a tiny bet.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the rationale behind using the tiny bet amount, which could be helpful for future maintainers:
def get_betting_strategy(self, market: AgentMarket) -> BettingStrategy: user_id = market.get_user_id(api_keys=APIKeys()) + # Use tiny bet amount for consistent, low-risk betting across different market conditions total_amount = market.get_tiny_bet_amount().amount if existing_position := market.get_position(user_id=user_id): total_amount += existing_position.total_amount.amount
Line range hint
315-321: LGTM! Consider grouping the observed methods for better readability.The addition of automatic method observation using the
observe()decorator is a great improvement for consistent logging and monitoring across subclasses.To improve readability, consider grouping the observed methods:
def initialize_langfuse(self) -> None: super().initialize_langfuse() # Auto-observe all the methods where it makes sense, so that subclassses don't need to do it manually. - self.have_bet_on_market_since = observe()(self.have_bet_on_market_since) # type: ignore[method-assign] - self.verify_market = observe()(self.verify_market) # type: ignore[method-assign] - self.answer_binary_market = observe()(self.answer_binary_market) # type: ignore[method-assign] - self.process_market = observe()(self.process_market) # type: ignore[method-assign] - self.build_trades = observe()(self.build_trades) # type: ignore[method-assign] + for method_name in [ + "have_bet_on_market_since", + "verify_market", + "answer_binary_market", + "process_market", + "build_trades", + ]: + setattr(self, method_name, observe()(getattr(self, method_name))) # type: ignore[method-assign]This approach reduces repetition and makes it easier to add or remove methods from the observation list in the future.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- prediction_market_agent_tooling/deploy/agent.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
prediction_market_agent_tooling/deploy/agent.py (1)
Line range hint
1-1000: Overall, the changes look good and align with the PR objectives.The modifications to
get_betting_strategyandinitialize_langfusemethods improve the betting logic and observability of theDeployableTraderAgentclass. The changes are well-implemented and consistent with the PR title "Default to tiny bet in DeployableTraderAgent".A few minor suggestions have been made to enhance documentation and readability, but these are not critical for the functionality of the code.
No description provided.