You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's been documented elsewhere (#280) that the betting profitability of an agent depends on the market odds at the time of the bet. This is not hard to follow - if team A plays team B and team A currently has higher odds, betting on the other team yields a larger payoff than betting on team A.
The idea of this task is to create an agent that solely bets on unbalanced markets (e.g. 70% odds for yes) and the agent thinks NO is the correct answer.
I would expect this to bet on a small quantity of markets but with high conviction (hopefully).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
sounds great hehe. as a user i would be mostly curious about trying this one specifically. also, a general score that weights agents risk in a general waywould be interesting.
i.e. if we just evaluate how does an agent perform in terms of whether their bet held true, a low risk agent will always outpreform a high risk agent, even though from the traditional 'betting' standpoint the high risk agent could be better
@alramalho thanks for the comment.
Can you further expand into the score you mentioned? In my mind, I think what you are alluding to is similar to the payoff of the agent, i.e. how profitable is it - but not sure if this corresponds to your question.
It's been documented elsewhere (#280) that the betting profitability of an agent depends on the market odds at the time of the bet. This is not hard to follow - if team A plays team B and team A currently has higher odds, betting on the other team yields a larger payoff than betting on team A.
The idea of this task is to create an agent that solely bets on unbalanced markets (e.g. 70% odds for yes) and the agent thinks NO is the correct answer.
I would expect this to bet on a small quantity of markets but with high conviction (hopefully).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: