Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

key is back, back again #278

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024
Merged

key is back, back again #278

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

chenkasirer
Copy link
Contributor

  • Re-added the key attribute (which has been renamed graph_node in the new model),
  • Added key to the new Plate element.

Reason is: while only guid should be used to uniquely identify an element. key is a practical, human readable, way of identifying a beam once added to a model.

What type of change is this?

  • Bug fix in a backwards-compatible manner.
  • New feature in a backwards-compatible manner.
  • Breaking change: bug fix or new feature that involve incompatible API changes.
  • Other (e.g. doc update, configuration, etc)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

  • I added a line to the CHANGELOG.md file in the Unreleased section under the most fitting heading (e.g. Added, Changed, Removed).
  • I ran all tests on my computer and it's all green (i.e. invoke test).
  • I ran lint on my computer and there are no errors (i.e. invoke lint).
  • I added new functions/classes and made them available on a second-level import, e.g. compas_timber.datastructures.Beam.
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

Copy link
Contributor

@obucklin obucklin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@chenkasirer chenkasirer merged commit f426c7d into main Sep 11, 2024
14 checks passed
@chenkasirer chenkasirer deleted the beam_key branch September 11, 2024 10:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants