Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add actual and upcoming overload : limitViolationInfos #74

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Nov 21, 2023

Conversation

souissimai
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Maissa SOUISSI <maissa.souissi@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Maissa SOUISSI <maissa.souissi@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Maissa SOUISSI <maissa.souissi@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Maissa SOUISSI <maissa.souissi@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Maissa SOUISSI <maissa.souissi@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Maissa SOUISSI <maissa.souissi@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Maissa SOUISSI <maissa.souissi@rte-france.com>
…g_overload field

Signed-off-by: Maissa SOUISSI <maissa.souissi@rte-france.com>
TwoWindingsTransformer twoWindingsTransformer = network.getTwoWindingsTransformer(equipmentId);
if (twoWindingsTransformer != null) {
tempLimit = handleEquipmentLimitViolation(twoWindingsTransformer, limitViolationInfo);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider also the three windings transformer

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked with PO and Techlead, we will not consider three windings transformer

@souissimai souissimai removed the request for review from anistouri November 20, 2023 11:23
Copy link
Contributor

@dbraquart dbraquart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

code: some changes requested
tests: ok (still testing tho)

Signed-off-by: Maissa SOUISSI <maissa.souissi@rte-france.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@dbraquart dbraquart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

code: another rename requested
tests: ok

remark: Existing LF computation results cannot be displayed correctly using the new format. Did we plan to migrate the results (complex!), to remove all LF results (admin-tool script), to do nothing ?

Signed-off-by: Maissa SOUISSI <maissa.souissi@rte-france.com>
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

80.6% 80.6% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@dbraquart dbraquart self-requested a review November 20, 2023 16:25
Copy link
Contributor

@dbraquart dbraquart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

code: ok
tests: not done with last commit

@souissimai souissimai merged commit 999ea91 into main Nov 21, 2023
4 checks passed
@souissimai souissimai deleted the adjust_loadFlow_results_limit_violations branch November 21, 2023 10:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants