Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Elemental merge+ workflow suggestions #426

Closed
Luke2642 opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 0 comments
Closed

Elemental merge+ workflow suggestions #426

Luke2642 opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@Luke2642
Copy link

Luke2642 commented Jan 3, 2025

Your elemental merger is fantastic, but it changes the paradigm completely, in a good way. Roll the dice!

Typically I find using a low range 0 to 0.1 and multiple iterations, saving out the checkpoint and reselecting the new one.

To make it easier I have some suggestions:

I would like the random values to be from a normal distribution, where both peak value and width are parameters. This would make more sparse changes.

It would be even better if you could apply a gradA, gradV etc multiplier, effectively filtering the areas the elemental merge will affect.

For the workflow it would be great if you could set it to do 5 variants with 5 prompts 5 seeds on an xy grid then you easily choose the variant to be the new base, and repeat.

Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 18, 2025
@hako-mikan hako-mikan converted this issue into discussion #440 Jan 18, 2025

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant