Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix invalid terraform drifting to redis in global replication groups #39950

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jramosf
Copy link
Contributor

@jramosf jramosf commented Oct 30, 2024

Description

This change follows-up on #39745 and fixes a bug which causes drift for ElastiCache Global Datastore in Valkey.

This is due to the current hard-coded default value for the engine argument, which inevitably causes the drift even in a terraform plan in an empty state importing an existing aws_elasticache_replication_group resource with the global_replication_group_id argument set (if this argument is set, the redis value in engine argument should not be passed).

      ~ engine                         = "valkey" -> "redis" # forces replacement

The API parameter in AWS for Engine is not required and has a default value, which brings the Terraform provider in line with AWS API behaviour.

Relations

Relates #39745

References

Output from Acceptance Testing

As per the contributor guide I would prefer the tests run on HashiCorp side.

@jramosf jramosf requested a review from a team as a code owner October 30, 2024 19:40
Copy link

Community Note

Voting for Prioritization

  • Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize this pull request.
  • Please see our prioritization guide for information on how we prioritize.
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.

For Submitters

  • Review the contribution guide relating to the type of change you are making to ensure all of the necessary steps have been taken.
  • For new resources and data sources, use skaff to generate scaffolding with comments detailing common expectations.
  • Whether or not the branch has been rebased will not impact prioritization, but doing so is always a welcome surprise.

@github-actions github-actions bot added service/elasticache Issues and PRs that pertain to the elasticache service. needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. labels Oct 30, 2024
@justinretzolk justinretzolk added bug Addresses a defect in current functionality. and removed needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. labels Oct 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Addresses a defect in current functionality. service/elasticache Issues and PRs that pertain to the elasticache service.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants