Drop unnecessary prefix in display name

[timja]

Jira link

See PROJ-XXXXXX

Change description

Testing done

Checklist

• commit messages are meaningful and follow good commit message guidelines
• README and other documentation has been updated / added (if needed)
• tests have been updated / new tests has been added (if needed)
• Does this PR introduce a breaking change

🤖AEP PR SUMMARY🤖

• main.tf```: Changed the name of the organization ruleset from "Rule Set Production Repositories" to "Production Repositories" and updated the code accordingly.

[github-actions]

Additional Improvements for components/main.tf

1. Immutable Naming Convention

Changing the name of resources like the GitHub organization ruleset might lead to unintended consequences or confusion. Using an immutable naming convention can help maintain consistency and avoid potential misconfigurations.

• Example:
  hcl
  name = "prod_repos_ruleset_v1"

2. Explicit Branch Name Targetting

The target property could be made more explicit by specifying which branch the rules apply to. This helps in understanding quickly the scope of the rules without needing additional documentation or assumptions.

• Example:

  target = \"main\" # If targeting the main branch

3. Adding a Description

Descriptions are invaluable in infrastructure as code for future maintainers. Adding a concise description to resources helps to quickly understand the purpose and scope of a resource without diving deep into its configuration.

• Example:

  description = \"Enforcement rules for production repositories\"

4. Reviewing Security

While the provided diff snippet does not directly suggest a security setting, it's crucial to ensure that the rules being enforced align with best practices. For example, requiring status checks before merging can prevent unreviewed or failed code from being merged.

• Example:

  require_status_checks = true

Cost and Carbon Usage Considerations

• Cost: The modifications suggested (naming convention, branch targeting, and descriptions) do not directly impact costs. However, enabling security features like status checks might require more CI/CD runs, potentially increasing the associated costs marginally if the number of runs exceeds the free tier. The support for these features would depend on the GitHub plan in use, so check for any additional costs if your plan has limitations or charges for certain features.

• Carbon Usage: Similarly, the direct impact of these changes on carbon usage is minimal. Indirectly, more efficient and secure workflows could prevent rework and reduce the carbon footprint by minimizing unnecessary compute resource utilization.

In summary, focusing on clear naming, explicit targeting, comprehensive descriptions, and security best practices can significantly enhance readability, maintainability, and security of the Terraform config without a direct cost or carbon usage impact.