Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

revise Vitessce view config for sn/scRNA-seq datasets #12

Open
ngehlenborg opened this issue Nov 17, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

revise Vitessce view config for sn/scRNA-seq datasets #12

ngehlenborg opened this issue Nov 17, 2021 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request feature: vitessce

Comments

@ngehlenborg
Copy link
Member

With Azimuth annotations available, the cell type annotations should be made more visible.

Suggested layout:

image (32)

The cell sets for the cell type should be listed first in the list, so that they show up in the top left corner.

@ngehlenborg ngehlenborg added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 17, 2021
@ilan-gold
Copy link
Member

@ngehlenborg One thing that just occurred to me - lots of clusters are going to get a bit smushed in the violin plot going horizontally.

@ngehlenborg
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, but it would be good to show it. Can we make it scrollable?

@ilan-gold
Copy link
Member

I think my point was more that making it smaller than it currently is would be not great. The scrollable idea is good. I'll make an issue for it in Vitessce.

@ngehlenborg
Copy link
Member Author

I think there is not enough space (in the current UI setup) to accommodate a view that is wide enough for all cell types no matter how wide we make it.

@ngehlenborg
Copy link
Member Author

We will revisit once hubmapconsortium/portal-ui#2298 has been resolved.

@mccalluc mccalluc transferred this issue from hubmapconsortium/portal-ui Feb 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request feature: vitessce
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants