Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Benchmarks 2.x #309

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 15, 2023
Merged

Benchmarks 2.x #309

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 15, 2023

Conversation

adam-fowler
Copy link
Member

@adam-fowler adam-fowler commented Dec 13, 2023

Benchmarks for HB 2.x

First run of this will fail as the benchmark code on 2.x.x branch is out of date. This needs to be merged before we see the benchmark CI working.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 13, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (4aa5c95) 84.78% compared to head (50483d1) 84.78%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            2.x.x     #309   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.78%   84.78%           
=======================================
  Files          79       79           
  Lines        4543     4543           
=======================================
  Hits         3852     3852           
  Misses        691      691           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@adam-fowler adam-fowler requested a review from Joannis December 13, 2023 14:10
trieRouterBenchmarks()
routerBenchmarks()
// The HTTP benchmarks are so variable I'm not sure they are worthwhile running
//http1Benchmarks()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any idea why they're so diverse?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know if it is a timing issue causing more allocations. I would prefer if we could get these more stable as they test the whole pipeline more thoroughly

@adam-fowler adam-fowler merged commit 0e4fe0c into 2.x.x Dec 15, 2023
4 of 5 checks passed
@adam-fowler adam-fowler deleted the benchmarks-2.x branch December 15, 2023 08:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants