-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Benchmarks 2.x #309
Benchmarks 2.x #309
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 2.x.x #309 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 84.78% 84.78%
=======================================
Files 79 79
Lines 4543 4543
=======================================
Hits 3852 3852
Misses 691 691 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
trieRouterBenchmarks() | ||
routerBenchmarks() | ||
// The HTTP benchmarks are so variable I'm not sure they are worthwhile running | ||
//http1Benchmarks() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any idea why they're so diverse?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know if it is a timing issue causing more allocations. I would prefer if we could get these more stable as they test the whole pipeline more thoroughly
cc2dcac
to
32dd839
Compare
Benchmarks for HB 2.x
First run of this will fail as the benchmark code on 2.x.x branch is out of date. This needs to be merged before we see the benchmark CI working.