Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Target Node 22 #446

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024
Merged

Target Node 22 #446

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

mattjohnsonpint
Copy link
Collaborator

@mattjohnsonpint mattjohnsonpint commented Oct 9, 2024

Description

We're very close to the Node 22 LTS date. It makes sense to switch now, rather than launch Modus under Node 20 and switch so soon. See https://github.com/nodejs/release#release-schedule

Also updates other NPM dependencies to latest.

Checklist

  • Code compiles correctly and linting passes locally
  • Tests for new functionality and regression tests for bug fixes added
  • Documentation added or updated
  • Entry added to the CHANGELOG.md file describing and linking to this PR

@mattjohnsonpint mattjohnsonpint requested a review from a team as a code owner October 9, 2024 18:13
Copy link

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/@types/node@22.7.5 None +1 2.34 MB types
npm/as-test@0.3.5 Transitive: environment, filesystem, shell +41 4.41 MB jairussw
npm/typescript-eslint@8.8.1 Transitive: environment, filesystem +39 8.17 MB jameshenry
npm/typescript@5.6.3 None 0 22.4 MB andrewbranch, minestarks, rbuckton, ...5 more

🚮 Removed packages: npm/@eslint/js@9.11.1, npm/eslint@9.11.1

View full report↗︎

@mattjohnsonpint mattjohnsonpint merged commit df0f8d9 into main Oct 9, 2024
75 checks passed
@mattjohnsonpint mattjohnsonpint deleted the mjp/hyp-2381-target-node-22 branch October 9, 2024 18:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants